Here’s my take about this “confusion” in terms of scores like that of in live voting. Hehe.

Even though an artist received thousands of votes in a pre or live voting but the gap of scores between them and the artist who got the highest number of votes is extremely huge, it’s... https://twitter.com/pinoyaroha/status/1384873404399067140

... possible for them to get 1 point or even lower (who knows).

Let’s say for example live voting is 1000 points, and below are the raw data or number of votes the artists got:

Artist A: 1,050 votes
Artist B: 84,000 votes
Artist C: 1,500,000 votes...

... Artist C obviously got the highest votes among all the artists. That being said, artist C’s score will be the “standard” score, and artist c will automatically get the 1,000 live voting points. While, for us to be able to determine...

... what will be the scores of artists a & b, we will divide each of the number of votes they got by the number of votes of the artist who got the highest votes. Which, in this case artist C (1,500,000) and multiply it with 1000 (highest possible score)...

... Artist A:
1,050 divided by 1,500,000 = 0.0007 x 1000 =0.7
Artist A got a live voting score that is even lower than 1 (0.7) but when rounded off he/she will get 1 point...

... Artist B
84,000 divided by 1,500,000 = 0.056 x 1000 =56
Artist B’s live voting score is 56...

... So, getting a score of 1 or even 0 doesn’t mean an artist didn’t receive any vote. It is just that in computing scores like this, the scores are relative to one another. That’s why when an artist received a very huge amount of votes as compare to the other artist,...

... regardless of how many thousand of votes the other artists got but the gap is extremely huge, chances are they’ll get a very low points.