Read on Twitter
@DraftersFantasy is unique in that there are 20 rounds w/ no DST
How should you spend your 19th and 20th Round picks?
The common belief is these last 2 rounds are saved for WRs, as they are the "most likely" to produce this late
Yet, RBs have had the slight edge in hit rate
How should you spend your 19th and 20th Round picks?
The common belief is these last 2 rounds are saved for WRs, as they are the "most likely" to produce this late
Yet, RBs have had the slight edge in hit rate
I suspect this relates to Functional Fantasy Points (link below) https://www.rotoviz.com/2020/07/functional-fantasy-points-and-why-youre-overvaluing-volatility-in-best-ball/
WRs in Rounds 19/20 may be more likely to produce ~any~ fantasy points. But how likely are they going to produce difference-making Functional Fantasy Points?
While RBs are probably more likely to score 0 points, they are also more likely to score FFP.
While RBs are probably more likely to score 0 points, they are also more likely to score FFP.
Best Ball drafters seem to overvalue the idea of 19-20th round WRs scoring random long TDs.
But drafters are undervaluing the binary outcomes of RBs drafted in the super late rounds. When in reality we should be chasing these "all or nothing" picks late
But drafters are undervaluing the binary outcomes of RBs drafted in the super late rounds. When in reality we should be chasing these "all or nothing" picks late
You can find the historical Best Ball win rate data @RotoViz https://www.rotoviz.com/bestball-win-rate-explorer/
Most importantly, this thread is Shawn Siegele approved
Shawn pointed out: in 28 round FFPC drafts, taking RBs early and a lot of WRs late is not a successful approach.
There seems to be this myth that at WR you can sacrifice quality and make up for it in quantity
Shawn pointed out: in 28 round FFPC drafts, taking RBs early and a lot of WRs late is not a successful approach.
There seems to be this myth that at WR you can sacrifice quality and make up for it in quantity
