Read on Twitter
aight making this thread as studying vent/shitposting inside the teachings of international business.
gonna flag that it& #39;s not the most exciting thing and tend to be largely on the logistics and base mostly on the numbers game (cos capital).
gonna flag that it& #39;s not the most exciting thing and tend to be largely on the logistics and base mostly on the numbers game (cos capital).
subject: global supply chain and ways to strengthen their capacity after the disruption.
a lot of it is abt the efficient flow of goods/world trade between nations. as if they& #39;re not worried enough after covid and then got hit with the Suez canal fiasco.
a lot of it is abt the efficient flow of goods/world trade between nations. as if they& #39;re not worried enough after covid and then got hit with the Suez canal fiasco.
the general consensus for this report has a focus on reduction of human labor for manual work, closing the gap of logistical efficiency, and a potential redirection/diversification of production bases.
all of those strategic moves are based upon the behavioral economic in response to government policies in the past years. as we& #39;re expecting a hit in recession + stagnant wages + inflation + the unchanged demand rates in consumption.
these corporations want to *sell* shit.
these corporations want to *sell* shit.
key takeaways to improve the chain:
- a redirection of "growth" in scale and strengthening the existing structure.
- automation is highly encouraged w an emphasise on software management in global tracking devices.
- a need for trade traffic block+quality supply source.
- a redirection of "growth" in scale and strengthening the existing structure.
- automation is highly encouraged w an emphasise on software management in global tracking devices.
- a need for trade traffic block+quality supply source.
the critiques on why the chain is failing:
- a passive reaction to market demands > prompting excess of goods that would be out of management capacity.
- unrealistic ambition of geographical trading route (Suez canal block).
1/n
- a passive reaction to market demands > prompting excess of goods that would be out of management capacity.
- unrealistic ambition of geographical trading route (Suez canal block).
1/n
- lack of investment/bridging process between local and offshore supply base for a smooth delivery.
- working conditions that are proven to be detrimental to human labor that only boost productivity in a certain amount of time frame.
2/2
- working conditions that are proven to be detrimental to human labor that only boost productivity in a certain amount of time frame.
2/2
final verdict:
a cloggy and mindless framework which is proven to be weak, unsustainable, costly/wasteful due to an overreach goal of scale without any foundational maintenance about the meaning of trade.
a cloggy and mindless framework which is proven to be weak, unsustainable, costly/wasteful due to an overreach goal of scale without any foundational maintenance about the meaning of trade.
