Still don’t quite get imaging culture. Other than ‘reassurance’ re sinister pathology and diagnostic surety, why are some pts so adamant for something which most likely won’t change their initial treatment Mx?

‘If we can see what’s going on we can treat it correctly’ Clearly beliefs + expectations have been tainted to the point whereby a clinician performing thorough Subj/Obj Ax along with a clinical history is met with resistance unless a digital image corroborates what has been said

Funny part is, we (I hope) aren’t claiming to be 100% bang on with clinical diagnoses anyway - and neither should the holy grail of which can often be riddled with incidental findings etc