Read on Twitter
How to disable an emotional ideological override. A wizardry 
This is a very specifically written masterclass tweet. I'm going to explain the mechanics how this is done, so you can use this technique if you get into a discussion with someone too. https://twitter.com/DanTalks1/status/1383572445827780608
This is a very specifically written masterclass tweet. I'm going to explain the mechanics how this is done, so you can use this technique if you get into a discussion with someone too. https://twitter.com/DanTalks1/status/1383572445827780608
First words in whatever you write are what's perceived as most important in any interaction that isn't pure logic. When I say "you have to admit", this is what's called a forced agreement in hypnosis. Where the fact of reading on you are likely to agree with whatever comes next.
What is the statement that I get agreement about? That the psychological operation against women having kids is SKILLED.
By saying it's skilled, I'm forcing the unconscious to accept a multitude of premises that unless skilled in argumentation will simply accept.
By saying it's skilled, I'm forcing the unconscious to accept a multitude of premises that unless skilled in argumentation will simply accept.
1st premise that it's a psychological operation is actually happening, I have offered no proof of this statement, but have agreement on it.
2nd premise is that it's skilled. This has two implied statements, 1 that the people doing it are very good. But more importantly,
2nd premise is that it's skilled. This has two implied statements, 1 that the people doing it are very good. But more importantly,
There's no shame in falling for it if you have. Don't underestimate shame as a reason why people don't change ideologically.
Once they read that far, if they are persuadable, they will accept what has been said.
The next statement is me then inversing or implanting
Once they read that far, if they are persuadable, they will accept what has been said.
The next statement is me then inversing or implanting
The alternate statement. If you accept that statement, you then associate the statement with authority. Which means whatever I say now you will accept as fact.
Which is that women have a unique gift to create life. This is stated as a fact, and accepted without question.
Which is that women have a unique gift to create life. This is stated as a fact, and accepted without question.
Successfully undoing a logical override someone may have had for the prior belief.
Now we need to cement the new belief by removing the counter arguments, not by reason but by ridicule. While illogical, far more effective. When I say "they managed to convince" it again
Now we need to cement the new belief by removing the counter arguments, not by reason but by ridicule. While illogical, far more effective. When I say "they managed to convince" it again
Re enforces skill of what has happened. But in a way that implies it's incorrect again. "Convince" has a negative connotation to it. By adding laughing emoji, we then associate ridicule image to the statement.
Anyone on the fence who is persuadable will likely have been.
Anyone on the fence who is persuadable will likely have been.
The last statement again re-enforces our premise. That's all it does.
