I can answer this one. The study is not a peer reviewed or from a major university. It’s a textbook example of a dodgy source. Let me explain. https://twitter.com/naomirwolf/status/1383218165165936643

It was easy to find the url for the study because anti-vax and conspiracy theory Twitter has gone wild for it.

It’s by someone called Baruch Vainshelboim. He seems to be a sports physiologist with some link to Stanford. But the publication in which his work appears is not peer-reviewed, and it has weird spelling mistakes and footnotes with no page refs.

And here it is, cited in a classroom example of how to teach people to spot dubious scientific research on the internet. https://www.amgenbiotechexperience.com/seeing-not-necessarily-believing

So I think this why you were given a short ban. You misrepresented some random article on the internet as a Stanford peer-reviewed study, which Twitter probably counts as medical misinformation. Now you know this you can issue a correction to your 125k followers