Thread by @PerpetualValue, I’ll cover the subject of mRNA vaccines. I warn you. Do not [...]

I’ll cover the subject of mRNA vaccines.

I warn you.

Do not read this twitter thread if you want to stay stuck in your belief that the vaccine is your golden ticket to pre-pandemic life!

Do read it if you want to be informed about what would be injected in your body.

1/

These vaccines are considered the holy grail of this pandemic. No one talks anymore about natural immunity. According to Bill Gates everyone needs to be injected in order to get back to normal.

https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/138080510354069913

2/">https://twitter.com/Bobby_Net...

https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/138080510354069913

So, what are these vaccines and how do they work?
Well, first of all let& #39;s drop the definition of & #39;vaccine& #39; and define them better as "experimental gene therapy".

No, that was a conspiracy, right?

3/

Let me introduce you the BioNTech SEC Filing, November 2020:

"mRNA therapies have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products"
"Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA."

https://investors.biontech.de/node/8746/html

4/">https://investors.biontech.de/node/8746...

"There have been few approvals of gene therapy products in the United States and other jurisdictions, and there have been well-reported significant adverse events associated with their testing and use.

That reads like scrutiny is needed.

5/

“Gene therapy products have the effect of introducing new DNA and potentially irreversibly changing the DNA in a cell. In contrast, mRNA is highly unlikely to localize to the nucleus, integrate into cell DNA, or otherwise make any permanent changes to cell DNA.”

6/

“Although our mRNA product candidates are designed not to make any permanent changes to cell DNA, regulatory agencies or others could believe that adverse effects of gene therapy products caused by introducing new DNA and

7/

“irreversibly changing the DNA in a cell could also be a risk for our mRNA investigational therapies, and as a result may delay one or more of our trials or impose additional testing for long- term side effects. "

8/

As an investor I know Investor Communications are always as positively dressed as possible. Therefore, I’m not particularly impressed by the fact that they can’t exclude the event of the mRNA changing the DNA.

9/

A vaccine is normally a dead or weakened virus that is injected. This will create an immune response which will raise our protection.

This new experimental vaccine is called mRNA and that stands for messengerRNA. With mRNA has only been experimented with so far.

10/

mRNA basically sends RNA into your body which would need to stimulate a coronavirus immune response. In the testing of the mRNA technique there have been big risks so far. The gene therapy might stir up an immune response that could make the gene therapy a health risk.

11/

"In animal studies, the ideal dose of their leading mRNA therapy was triggering dangerous immune reactions — the kind for which Karikó had improvised a major workaround under some conditions — but a lower dose had proved too weak to show any benefits."

https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/10/the-story-of-mrna-how-a-once-dismissed-idea-became-a-leading-technology-in-the-covid-vaccine-race
12">https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/1...

The story of mRNA: From a loose idea to a tool that may help curb Covid

Scientists have dreamed about the possibilities of custom-made messenger RNA. The pandemic may turn those possibilities into realilty.

https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/10/the-story-of-mrna-how-a-once-dismissed-idea-became-a-leading-technology-in-the-covid-vaccine-race

Animal studies for SARS coronavirus vaccines have proven disastrous for the animals.

"ALL mice exhibited histopathologic changes"

Conclusion: “Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated”
Caution needed!

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/

13/">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/...

Is caution applied?

The vaccines have only received “Conditional” Marketing Authorisation in contrast to regular Marketing Authorisation from the EMA

From the FDA only EAU, Emergency Use Authorization have been granted.

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/glossary/conditional-marketing-authorisation

14/">https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/glossa...

Conditional marketing authorisation

The approval of a medicine that addresses unmet medical needs patients on the basis less comprehensive data than normally required. available must indicate medicine’s benefits outweigh its risks and...

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/glossary/conditional-marketing-authorisation

"Approval of a medicine... ...on the basis of less comprehensive data than normally required"
"... the applicant should be in a position to provide the comprehensive clinical data in the future."

Has any politician told you this?

15/

The Efficacy and Safety confirmation will only be confirmed in 2023. Yet, we plan to vaccinate the global population.

https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf

16/">https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents...

There are still many unknown risks as can be seen from the document.
How can we know the Long-term risks?

17/

There has not been an approved mRNA vaccine that has run through FDA Phase 3. That is including now by the way. Read that again. That basically means the person that is going to be vaccinated is the Phase 3 experimental subject.

18/

How does Regular Marketing Authority look like for vaccine development?

19/

How does this look for the C19 ‘vaccines’?
This image from EMA is very misleading. It actually pretends that all Phase III studies are completed before the vaccine is available for use. This is NOT true. When the ‘vaccines’ were given CMA Phase 2 studies were still collected.
20

Normally, the process to develop a vaccine takes much longer. It is simply impossible to speed-up this process and learn the long-term consequences and apply the same scientific rigor.

21/

And how fast have other vaccines been developed in the past?

22/

And

23/

The fastest vaccine has been developed in 5 years.

24/

How did it go with the development against coronaviruses?

There is no vaccine to protect you against human coronaviruses and there are no specific treatments for illnesses caused by human coronaviruses.”

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/general-information.html
25/">https://www.cdc.gov/coronavir...

So let’s look into these ‘vaccines’ with 95% reported efficacy that have been approved under Conditional Marketing Authorisation in Nov 2020, after just 8 months of development.

26/

Emer Cooke, head EMA, came in just before this approval. In Nov 2020.

mr. Hauser shows that Emer Cooke, head EMA, has deep connections with the pharmaceutical industry. She was a lobbyist for these companies for years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqH9CoXXYIs

27/">https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Study of 43,548 participants.
Funded by Pfizer/BioNTech.
Mind-blowing 95% efficacy.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

28/">https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/...

Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | NEJM

Original Article from The New England Journal of Medicine — Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

Safety had been tested over 2 months.... So we basically knew nothing about medium or long-term risks.

29/

Even worse, they were still collecting Phase 2(!) and 3 data about & #39;immunogenicity& #39; and & #39;durability& #39; of the immune response.
Basically, that means that they don& #39;t know yet whether the vaccine will create an immune response against SARS-CoV-2 infection and for how long

30/

And look at this.... Key exclusion criteria:
- treatment with immunosuppressive therapy or
- diagnosis with an immunocompromising condition

They are excluding exactly the people who have most to fear from COVID19. Does this make sense?

31/

Let me remind you who’s most at risk for C19.
>84% had comorbidities

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32659414/

32/">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32659414/...

Average age > 80.
People under 70 and without comorbidities have very little to fear of C19 death.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33289900/

33/">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33289900/...

Also to be seen in the registered deaths in Holland since the start of the pandemic.

173 of healthy (no comorbidities) and young (<70) persons were registered to die so far. This is on a population of almost 17,500,000.

https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2021-04/COVID-19_WebSite_rapport_wekelijks_20210413_1259.pdf

34/">https://www.rivm.nl/sites/def...

Very low proportion of old people were found in the study.
Who funded the research? And who was responsible for the design and conduct of the study?
Ah, Pfizer and BioNTech!

35/

They speak of an efficacy of 95%. That means 9 people that screen positive for & #39;Covid19& #39; in the placebo group and 169 in the vaccine group.

But how did they define Covid19?

simply: any mild symptoms (coughing, fever muscle pain) plus a PCR test.

36/

Informed people already know that the PCR test is very unreliable. I made a twitter thread on this topic.

https://twitter.com/PerpetualValue/status/1361601758305390596

37/">https://twitter.com/Perpetual...

https://twitter.com/PerpetualValue/status/1361601758305390596

Latest Threads Unrolled: