Now the thing is this: the doctor is brilliant. The work is worthwhile. And the German work is mentioned as “The German group had quite a lot of experience with this particular condition.” It’s not the scientists that messed up here. It’s the journalists. Sorry folks. /2
But besides the sheer frustration of a storyline changing so quickly, I think there’s a lesson to draw here: a lesson of how quickly Brexit established a boundary in the mind. /3
Leavers AND remainers empathised so quickly, so completely with “their” agency over ”other” agencies that the outcome could only be: our agency says no connection, so an agency that sees a connection must be unscientific. /4
Apparently nobody bothered to ask scientists working in the field. Regulators. To find out things like we read now “The German group had quite a lot of experience with this particular condition.” /5
But the thing that scares me most is that this distinction actually makes sense in a world that’s interconnected. The AZ risk is very low - so low that in most age groups vaccination with AZ has a thoroughly clear benefit. /6
And the availability of AZ is different in the UK and in Germany - which makes Germany’s more stringent limits rational. And it is then again rational for UK regulators to fear that this has some impact. So now we are in a circle of discrediting each other /7
You can follow @hhesterm.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: