I'm trying to think of why I hate social justice vocabulary so deeply, when I often agree with the concepts it expresses, and I think its just the sameness of it. Its the idea that using a particular bit of jargon makes you good, inclusive, or righteous
... while failing to use that jargon makes you evil and retrograde. It's the refusal to acknowledge that this vocabulary is just the vocabulary of a specific culture, rather than the vocabulary of objective goodness
Above all, I hate it because it encourages people to avoid putting their beliefs in their own words.
I think about the rhetorical uniqueness, directness and insight of a man like Fred Hampton is worth aspiring to, rather than the endless repetition of certain phrases (however worthy the ideas they express)
Every group has its own lingo, customs and stock phrases. The problem is when the group thinks that this lingo needs to be adopted by everyone, verbatim.

An example: I'm not a Christian, but I think saying grace is a lovely practice, with lovely intentions behind it
I'm happy to bow my head when visiting a Christian home where grace is said. But I don't think saying grace means that someone is a good person, or that I'm a bad person because I don't say grace.
Saying Christian grace is not the only way for someone to express gratitude at the nourishing bounty of the earth - and mandating grace would not lead to more people appreciating that bounty. It would mostly become an unconsidered recitation of stock phrases.
You can follow @mollycrabapple.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: