“The best bad-ass developers aren't active on social media. They don't have 100s of followers”

How did you come to this fallacy? How is best defined? Are you that acquainted to know they are not the best?

Isn’t this a foolish generalization for a field you know nothing about? https://twitter.com/_ndianabasi/status/1381377747205951489

This isn’t the only fallacy in the thread, @_ndianabasi still went on to blame “messy” code on developers, rather than the company’s LACK of relevant precess to handle developers leaving — a constant in high speed tech space

This more than anything shows that he’s a charlatan!

1. It’s the company’s lack of GOOD interview process that makes them hire wrongly

2. It’s highly the company’s bad process that results in high technical debt

3. Blaming your INCOMPETENCE on “celebrity” devs doesn’t solve the problem, it just assigns it to a different agent

It’s the ridiculous poor thought process and inability to expose yours thoughts to disconfirmatory facts that gives such narrow and naive conclusions like this

Inability to appreciate the potent nature of social learning, and the more a dev stay exposed, the rusty they get

A good verified refuter to the initial premise are that creators & contributors of rails, react, angular etc are on Twitter with THOUSANDS of ffs & they ARE ACTIVE

Sometimes, an idea make it out of Twitter/FB & made it into feature, react concurrent mode started on Facebook!

And here is another RIDICULOUS premise

How dare you employers work ONLY for the time they are being paid for? They are suppose to work more?

Why? by FIAT, the company comes before YOUR CAREER

He obviously didn’t think this through to its conclusions and consequences https://twitter.com/_ndianabasi/status/1381383695718825990