Read on Twitter
Anybody who& #39;s been fuming about substack should be embarrassed after they absorb this uncontroversial point from @benyt. It& #39;s just an email service provider that links to a payment processor. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/11/business/media/substack-newsletter-competition.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/1...
Actually, you don& #39;t have to be embarrassed, I& #39;m embarrassed for you, so I& #39;ve saved you the trouble.
Hey, subscribe to my substack.
Or don& #39;t! See how easy that was? https://badnews.substack.com/ ">https://badnews.substack.com/">...
Or don& #39;t! See how easy that was? https://badnews.substack.com/ ">https://badnews.substack.com/">...
People know what an advance is right? Advance on future revenue. Yall know that right? If you don& #39;t meet your advance you& #39;re done. https://twitter.com/atomly/status/1381382926747660290?s=20">https://twitter.com/atomly/st...
Anyway, as somebody who& #39;s been on substack since 2017 and been writing a newsletter since 2014, I encourage everybody to not do a newsletter on substack. Definitely do not do that. No room there.
Impressively self aware from Ben here. I& #39;d subscribe to his free version but no chance I& #39;d do the premium. Y& #39;all would screenshot and share his best bits anyway.
It is not actually easy to email many people for free. It is in fact quite costly. That& #39;s bizarre, I know, but it& #39;s true, ask anybody who does email marketing or distribution. It& #39;s really expensive. https://twitter.com/alexophile/status/1381384188004274180?s=20">https://twitter.com/alexophil...
