In California: investigative journalists would do well to ask if Blue Shield’s in-network providers were given a disproportionately ⬆️ number of vaccine doses. https://twitter.com/thegarance/status/1381262460804608006
Why did the state allow Blue Shield to interrupt vaccine shipments to providers that didn’t play by its rules?

source: https://eziz.org/assets/docs/COVID19/Vax58ProviderFAQs.pdf#page5
Fact check: several of the vaccination sites are supplied directly via parallel federal programs (e.g. FQHCs, retail pharmacies).

Are they forced to become part of Blue Shield’s network? Or is Blue Shield overstating its role?

source: https://news.blueshieldca.com/2021/03/10/state-of-californias-enhanced-covid-19-vaccine-provider-network
“A TPA can also charge specific fees for its services, or it may make money through a combination of commission and fees depending on the scope of the services they provide”

Is Blue Shield generating revenue on top of the $15m paid by the state?

https://www.associationhealthplans.com/group-health/what-is-tpa/
😕 Follow-up: Blue Shield is claiming credit for vaccine providers for which it doesn’t have a direct relationship.

These are primarily federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), which are providers that serve primarily minority and immigrant communities. https://twitter.com/DataDrivenMD/status/1381270089845014529
🔥 So, the state paid $15m to Blue Shield, and the insurer is taking credit for the work of community clinics, local government, and federal programs. Cool. Cool.
Wholeheartedly agree that *massive* investments in grassroots partnerships are necessary at this point, which is why Blue Shield’s misleading statements are harmful. The company is taking credit for grassroots efforts that deliver real #VaccineEquity. https://twitter.com/christianarana/status/1381280134674620416
Comparing Blue Shield’s list of vaccination providers in underserved communities to the list of federal grant recipients, we see that Blue Shield’s #VaccineEquity strategy amounts to taking credit for others’ work.

https://bphc.hrsa.gov/emergency-response/coronavirus-covid19-FY2020-awards/ca

https://news.blueshieldca.com/2021/03/10/state-of-californias-enhanced-covid-19-vaccine-provider-network
This #VaccineEquity effort is in partnership with the County of Sacramento, which also gets COVID-19 vaccine doses directly from the federal government, but Blue Shield claims this vaccine provider as its own.

Which providers are *actually* receiving doses from Blue Shield? https://twitter.com/cmmaivang/status/1381303754989826048
🔥Data. Doesn’t. Lie.— According to the CDC Blue Shield controls 75% of COVID-19 vaccine doses delivered to the state of California. If they’re not going to #VaccineEquity efforts, then *where* are they going?

source: CDC
URL: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/distributing/jurisdiction-portfolios.html
👀 Why did VP Harris intervene in order to save a mass vaccination site that primarily serves BIPOC Californians?

Why couldn’t Blue Shield allocate doses previously supplied by FEMA? Where are the doses going?

URL: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/distributing/jurisdiction-portfolios.html
cc @MeghanBobrowsky @JoaquinPalomino https://twitter.com/sfchronicle/status/1379203152658923521
👀 Is Blue Shield gaming the system to avoid being in breach of contract?

Ensuring #VaccineEquity, including the enrollment of providers in underserved areas, is literally in Blue Shield’s contract with the state of California.

full contract here: https://files.covid19.ca.gov/pdf/Blue-shield-of-california-GovOps.pdf
👀 Why did the state give Blue Shield virtually unilateral control over which providers get access to COVID-19 vaccine doses?

Did Blue Shield give its existing in-network providers exclusive/early access to COVID-19 vaccine doses?

full contract here: https://files.covid19.ca.gov/pdf/Blue-shield-of-california-GovOps.pdf
👀 Why did the state give Blue Shield virtually unilateral control over which providers receive *financial incentives* for COVID-19 vaccinations?

Does Blue Shield’s formula give its existing in-network providers a financial advantage?

full contract here: https://files.covid19.ca.gov/pdf/Blue-shield-of-california-GovOps.pdf
🔥 Is Blue Shield counting doses administered by providers outside of the network it actually controls in order to meet capacity and equity metrics spelled out in the contract?

full contract here: https://files.covid19.ca.gov/pdf/Blue-shield-of-california-GovOps.pdf
In summary, Blue Shield:
Appears to have favored its in-network providers for initial vaccine allocations ➡️ fell behind its contractual obligations re: capacity and #VaccineEquity ➡️ trying to cover-up for the shortfall by claiming credit for federal- & community-driven efforts.
You can follow @DataDrivenMD.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: