Read on Twitter
Why disruption is good for organizations, and why @BJP4India does it the best:
Over time BJP has evolved as a party in the way it conducts its politics. ABV ran it in a certain way, LKA ran it in a certain way, and @narendramodi runs it in a certain way.The issues, the mediums,+
Over time BJP has evolved as a party in the way it conducts its politics. ABV ran it in a certain way, LKA ran it in a certain way, and @narendramodi runs it in a certain way.The issues, the mediums,+
+
the strategems, etc. all have been very different. In fact it would not be wrong to say that Namo disrupted how politics was done by BJP before him.
The credit for this disruption must go to the BJP, though Namo was the catalyst.
BJP has created a system where the top slot +
the strategems, etc. all have been very different. In fact it would not be wrong to say that Namo disrupted how politics was done by BJP before him.
The credit for this disruption must go to the BJP, though Namo was the catalyst.
BJP has created a system where the top slot +
+
is open for grabs. This is why different people, try different things to get there. Of these different things, the one that is most effective wins. As we have seen.
+
is open for grabs. This is why different people, try different things to get there. Of these different things, the one that is most effective wins. As we have seen.
+
+
Opposition on the other hand is not disruption friendly. If anything it is antithetic to any kind of disruption. Gandhis dont want disruption, Yadavs dont, and Pawars dont. Same goes for most other parties as well.
+
Opposition on the other hand is not disruption friendly. If anything it is antithetic to any kind of disruption. Gandhis dont want disruption, Yadavs dont, and Pawars dont. Same goes for most other parties as well.
+
+
Every style of governance, of strategy, of public appeal, has a shelf life. If the poet-patriot appeals to my grand father, the dynamic duo (Modi and Shah) appeal to me, a warrior monk may appeal to my next generation.
+
Every style of governance, of strategy, of public appeal, has a shelf life. If the poet-patriot appeals to my grand father, the dynamic duo (Modi and Shah) appeal to me, a warrior monk may appeal to my next generation.
+
+
But in a party insulated from disruption (Say, congress) they have no choice to flog the dead horse again and again. A person who tries to disrupt it is forced to leave the party...one way...or the other.
+
But in a party insulated from disruption (Say, congress) they have no choice to flog the dead horse again and again. A person who tries to disrupt it is forced to leave the party...one way...or the other.
+
+
When we look at the Clubhouse fiasco's or the Thapar-Baru chat lovefest, we see that they have no new ideas, and beyond lamenting why their old ideas are not working, they have no clue what to do.
+
When we look at the Clubhouse fiasco's or the Thapar-Baru chat lovefest, we see that they have no new ideas, and beyond lamenting why their old ideas are not working, they have no clue what to do.
+
+
@BJP4India is structurally stronger than other parties only because it allows disruption, even though the bosses at the top any any point in time may not like it. No incumbent 'likes' to be disrupted. But thats how technology, and parties progress.
@BJP4India is structurally stronger than other parties only because it allows disruption, even though the bosses at the top any any point in time may not like it. No incumbent 'likes' to be disrupted. But thats how technology, and parties progress.
