Read on Twitter
The question is whether the vaccine is the key to implementing the Passport, or whether the Passport is there to encourage people to take the vax? We now know that vaccines are the centrepiece of this operation and this explains the deaths of those holistic and anti-vax doctors.
We have seen almost every known vaccine side-effect crop up with these vaxes, including Guillane Barré syndrome, Bell’s Palsy, stroke and death. It’s a lucky dip where every prize is on offer. Why? Is it just because they were rushed, because that’s the excuse they’ll use.
How is it that, collectively, we have managed to ignore Autism rates of 1 in 36, ADHD and other behavioural/learning disorders, a constellation of auto-immune diseases, plunges in IQ of around 1 SD, leaky gut problems, and rampant emergence of dangerous allergies?
I find it useful to imagine the worst possible motives- the ones that would disappoint you the most from the perspective of humanity – and that will usually be the truth underlying what happened. If the vax damage to date was merely the gathering of data ...
and a series of experiments on the population at large, that would fit my criteria and also explain why discussion of vax damage was suppressed, and even ridiculed. These companies had immunity (also granted to them by govt) because they were part of The Plan.
We have known about cytokine storms and pathogenic priming for some time now, and they were beginning to emerge from research papers as reasons for vax damage and deadlier forms of otherwise mild diseases. So there was only so much time to execute The Plan.
What would be the best way to ensure that these reactions were set off in as many people as possible? Surely that would be to get inside the cell and have it manufacture the markers the immune system would recognise? That’s your mRNA vaccine.
Yes, I believe the aim is to make the deadliest vax cocktail they can manage, using all the data and research into vaccine injury, deliberately gathered over decades. Now that really does explain why they came down so hard on Dr Andrew Wakefield.
Now how do you get rid of all the naysayers, like me, who can see there is no actual pandemic? As @USLawreview pointed out, that would be to have a real one, where the common cold really does kill millions – all of whom have been primed for it with the vaccines.
This meets all the goals we have known about for so long. Depopulation, decimation of White European and Western Christian civilisation, implementation of the control society as outlined in Agenda 21 and, amidst the tragedy, the WEF’s Great economic Reset.
This also explains why the reactions to the present vaccines are being played down- >100,000 adverse reactions to AZ are characterised as a handful of “rare blood clots” - and why all other treatments are off the table; Ivermectin, HCQ etc.
Let’s be clear, the reason these mRNA and DNA vaccines have gone into mass distribution straight away is that they would not have survived clinical trials. At the very least, the scientific outcry would have halted blanket application.
If this were a real clinical trial, which is what it purports to be, the MDs in charge would presently be looking at losing their licences for not halting the trial and recklessly endangering millions of lives. The reason that doesn’t matter is they mean to kill you anyway.
So, to answer the opening question, the threat of a vaccine passport is there to encourage people, especially the young, to take the vaccine. There cannot be a passport unless the takeup of the vaccine is high. The passport is the immediate danger, the vaccine is the real one.
