So took that opportunity and used it for work lol
. Did the whole lot! Also guys, just incase i come across as bias - i don't care for either - or. I just back history and am a strong defender of neutrality. I do have a weakness because of death due to personal experience and


Don't like it treated casually. (a big problem with tr//ue cri//me for me, especially organized where it's so casually seen as cool). But i just don't like these weak arguments li//bs use lol. If you hate them, hate them. Don't defer to their titles on their most popular one,
you're only reenforcing those titles - if you hate the easiest to hate but melt like butter on their most popular one,are u revolutionary or enforcing the status quo? I know it's a meme and i know fun, but it does nothing. "I hate Pri//nce An//dr//ew" no shit, so does everyone.
Do you hate any of the "good" ones? Then you're playing into the messaging. Also - it's only natural for parents to defend their kids - if you hate them for that - it's just weak, you have to be reasonable. I think this is my larger point. I know it's corny and memes are fun but
they've replaced serious critique. I wanna be a historian so i have to be serious about it. I do have a natural reaction against it, because even with tru//e crim//e - these people do exist and have to be documented. I hate having to~defend~bad people all the time, but understand
y'all im coming from a historical background and i have to be neutral with it. I'm gonna make a list of all bad fields tomoz and do a thread on why they have to be documented the same. Unfornately mo//narc/hy is important, so are nob//le fams and rich fams. They are the base for
the society subcategory. It sucks, but it's how it goes. I'm not gonna act like this dude wasnt a major figure cause it's in, i have to be true to history. Anyway yeah, not tryna defend anyone, just tryna put my opinion on this situation out, hope yall get it, end thread. 



