THREAD: following reports of PLA Navy Type-022 Houbei catamaran missile fast attack craft harassing a motorboat chartered by ABS-CBN journalists in the Spratlys, Beijing's pretense about just using "white hulls" to promote SCS peace and stability is well over. Context is impt.
In recent years, especially after the disparate PRC maritime law enforcement agencies were unified under a single China Coast Guard, there has been internal debate within the agency about the challenges they face when carrying out maritime sovereignty and rights protection. 1/
One of the complaints within CCG is that, while PRC has been trying to "foster stability" by using "white hulls" to spearhead maritime sovereignty and rights protection duties, they often encounter navies of the SCS rivals, putting them at disadvantage, or so they claimed. 2/
Therefore, amongst various measures proposed, such as bolstering legislation (hence, the Coast Guard Law was promulgated), the CCG community called for stronger support from the PLA Navy, so that they can stand up against rival "grey hulls" in SCS. 3/
In May 2018, the first joint patrol involving the PLA Navy, CCG and Sansha local administration authorities was carried out over 5 days off the PRC-controlled Paracel Islands. This was to test a tailored and tiered response to maritime contingencies. 4/ http://m.xinhuanet.com/2018-05/20/c_1122858765.htm
The joint patrol tested this method: if they encountered a foreign navy vessel, the PLA Navy steps in; if they encountered a foreign coastguard vessel, CCG steps in. Infringements by local fishermen dealt with by Sansha local maritime authorities. 5/
It's clear that the PLA Navy has stepped up its involvement in concert with CCG and other forces, incl. maritime militia, in waters further out into the SCS, especially in the Spratlys. It's no longer just "white hull" but a combination with "grey hull". 6/
While CCG vessels tend to switch on their AIS simply to show their presence, the same doesn't always apply to PLA Navy assets. So the PRC entity that called itself "naval warship" in the Green Aura incident could well be a PLA Navy warship in the area. 9/
And late last month, a trio of PLA Navy Type-022 Houbei missile fast attack craft was spotted during an AFP aerial patrol along with a Dayun-class auxiliary at Mischief Reef, well within Philippine EEZ. 10/ https://globalnation.inquirer.net/194761/3-china-war-vessels-park-at-panganiban-reef-inside-ph-eez
It's unclear as yet whether the Houbei are permanently stationed or temporarily deployed to Mischief Reef. Or whether we're seeing a pattern of rotational deployment of PLA Navy assets the same way as Beijing does with civilian vessels such this one. 11/ http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-12/23/c_139611449.htm
What's evident is that the PLA Navy is now engaging in active patrols alongside the CCG and maritime militia in those so-called "waters under national jurisdiction" which include "other relevant waters" that should be interpreted to mean waters enclosed by 9DL. 12/
This latest PLA Navy harassment of the ABS-CBN chartered motorboat is not likely going to be a one-off, isolated incident. As part of the joint patrol framework involving CCG and other forces such as maritime militia across Paracel and Spratly Islands, we can expect repeats. 13/
The tiered response involving PLA Navy in PRC's maritime sovereignty and rights protection patrols in the SCS, coupled with the Coast Guard Law, carries serious ramifications for the concerned SE Asian parties. 14/
First is that SE Asian parties in SCS are traditionally hamstrung by shortfalls in maritime forces capacity; usually stronger in navies and weaker in coastguards. This means usually navies are on the front-line, and it may deter the CCG to an extent. 15/
But now with the PLA Navy actively involved in the patrols, there are higher chances of it being called upon by CCG to respond if the latter is confronted by any SE Asian navy patrol. PLA Navy surface combatants are superior to or matched at least with their rivals in SCS. 16/
While it's work in progress, it appears the process of promoting better coordination and synergy between PLA Navy, CCG and other forces is at least ahead of that in some other SE Asian parties in SCS. This will create more difficulty for the latter. 17/
Complicating the capacity shortfall problems in SE Asian maritime forces is the inter-service rivalries, duplication of efforts, overlapping mandates, stovepipes and turf wars between them, hampering inter-agency cooperation and coordination. 18/
It is therefore necessary not only to build assets and manpower, but also promote better inter-agency efforts, the need to revisit and put in place adequate maritime legislation, SOPs and suitable rules of engagement to deal with more complex scenarios at sea. 19/
This of course is the operational layer of what SE Asian parties can do in SCS, but it should be part of an overall, coherent whole-of-nation policy and strategy to deal with this evolving, increasingly complex gray zone aggression by Beijing. 20/
Finally, augmenting national-level initiatives to bolster whole-of-nation approach to maritime gray zone aggression should also be timely consideration for enhanced cooperation between like-minded SE Asian parties in the SCS, incl. better info-sharing. END
Some outlet essentially equated me to a purveyor of fake news by writing this thread. I not only stand by what I said, and my research, but also believe that nobody would put their own lives on the line at sea just to fabricate stories. https://twitter.com/chiarazambrano/status/1380323295539523586
You can follow @CollinSLKoh.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: