Incredible how you will claim that these images are illegal and yet repost cropped or censored versions of them yourself.

You know exactly what you're doing. Trying to make up reasons to harass innocent artists. Then when they bite back you're suddenly so fragile.

Seethe. https://twitter.com/largebakedbean/status/1380076402527985667

Obviously I don't condone retaliatory harassment, but you can't condemn a group unless you're ready to deal with the bad eggs that will be thrown at you from that group.

Especially since your friends are now spamming false accusations of pedophilia at people in your name.

Here's a handy guide.

Sharing CP in any form is illegal.

If you can 'censor' an image and believe it's okay to post it, either it's nowhere near CP, or you should be going to jail.

Which way, Western dolt?

There you go again.

There are children following you, children mobilising themselves to harass people in your name, and you are facilitating access to images that, to them, will look like pornography of a child.

What do we call that kind of behaviour? https://twitter.com/largebakedbean/status/1380200625728720906?s=19

Remember when a gimmick account got sent actual CP as harassment, and instead of reporting it to authorities they went 'hey everyone, look at this'

This is the same thing, except it isn't CSEM, it's a drawing. but it's a drawing minors shouldn't see, and you want them to see it.

Don't play dumb. These kids will think they're defending you by going to that image and reporting it.

You want them to see it. Say it louder for the people at the back.

You wanted lolicons to send you these images, so you could do this. You knew they would.

You are a groomer.

Here you are signal boosting a 15 year old's involvement in discourse about pornography

Why are you so interested in kids in discussing porn, @largebakedbean?

If you think loli porn depicts kids, why is your first thought not to safeguard the kids who follow you from seeing it?

Here you are signal-boosting another account that posted what you consider to be cropped cp and directed people to the nsfw account

Another account followed by many children.

Why, under any circumstance, do you think this should be seen as anything other than groomer behaviour?

To recap, here is the playbook:

- get audience with lots of kids in it by making a cute gimmick account
- use gimmick account to attack nsfw loli artists
- loli artists fight back
- encourage kids following you to engage with loli artists
- normalize kids discussing porn
- groom

If anyone can provide me with a reason as to why someone would wilfully expose kids to porn, loli art and assumed predators outside of wanting to normalize nsfw discussion to create a foundation for grooming, I am all ears

Kids should have no reason to even think about loli art.

I await their only response being a line under a certain word in my bio and calling me a pedophile.

Unless they're brave enough to try to explain why encouraging kids to involve themselves in NSFW discussions and engage with (what they believe to be) potential predators is okay.