Read on Twitter
I keep seeing the line 'EU is having vaccine problems because it was too slow in negotiating contracts' repeated in 
&
media.
I want to push back on this narrative because I think it's missing where real EU-level mistakes lie. Let's review what happened in past year (
1/17)
& media. I want to push back on this narrative because I think it's missing where real EU-level mistakes lie. Let's review what happened in past year (
1/17)
AstraZeneca signed purchasing agreement with EU one day before its agreement with UK.
AZ CEO told an EP hearing last month that UK priority comes from research funding agreement Oxford signed with UK gov in Jan/Feb 2020, inherited by AZ when it partnered with Oxford in May 2020.
AZ CEO told an EP hearing last month that UK priority comes from research funding agreement Oxford signed with UK gov in Jan/Feb 2020, inherited by AZ when it partnered with Oxford in May 2020.
was smart to start funding vax research before #Covid19 even hit Europe. But they made a consequential choice by (apparently) making funding conditional to Brits getting doses of any resulting vaccine 1st.
funded BioNTech but did not include any Europe 1st clause.
Meanwhile in March 2020, President Trump tried unsuccessfully to steal BioNTech from Germany to bring it to the US.
Despite this warning, apparently nobody in EU thought it might be a bad idea for BioNTech to be partnered with Pfizer, an American company. https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-confirms-that-donald-trump-tried-to-buy-firm-working-on-coronavirus-vaccine/
Despite this warning, apparently nobody in EU thought it might be a bad idea for BioNTech to be partnered with Pfizer, an American company. https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-confirms-that-donald-trump-tried-to-buy-firm-working-on-coronavirus-vaccine/
That nationality-agnostic approach to pharma partners was not the approach used across the channel in .
Oxford was originally going to partner with American company Merck. But the UK gov overruled it and made them partner with UK-based AstraZeneca.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-rejected-contracts-and-a-hollywood-movie-how-uk-struck-deal-to-guarantee-vaccine-supply-12204044
nationality-agnostic approach to pharma partners was not the approach used across the channel in .Oxford was originally going to partner with American company Merck. But the UK gov overruled it and made them partner with UK-based AstraZeneca.
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-rejected-contracts-and-a-hollywood-movie-how-uk-struck-deal-to-guarantee-vaccine-supply-12204044
The concern over vaccine nationalism turned out to be well-founded.
With BioNTech-Pfizer partnership secure, Trump seemed to be in no hurry to sign Pfizer purchase contracts.
Why? He knew a US vaccine export ban would make a contract unnecessary. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/trump-pfizer-vaccine-coronavirus
concern over vaccine nationalism turned out to be well-founded. With BioNTech-Pfizer partnership secure, Trump seemed to be in no hurry to sign Pfizer purchase contracts.
Why? He knew a US vaccine export ban would make a contract unnecessary. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/08/trump-pfizer-vaccine-coronavirus
Pfizer has massive production capacity in the US. If US law prevented any of those doses made on US soil from being exported, they would have to go to the US in any event.
The result can be seen in the supply chain. plants used to supply , 
plants used to supply 
.
The result can be seen in the supply chain.
plants used to supply , plants used to supply .
Sure enough, Trump signed an executive order in December 2020 giving Americans 1st priority to any vaccines made on US territory.
In fact it was largely symbolic. Trump & Biden have instead used the Defence Production Act as the legal basis for their ban. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13962-ensuring-access-united-states-government-covid-19-vaccines
In fact it was largely symbolic. Trump & Biden have instead used the Defence Production Act as the legal basis for their ban. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13962-ensuring-access-united-states-government-covid-19-vaccines
Also in December 2020, the UK & US used the emergency use authorisation method to approve Pfizer, while the EU used the more cautious conditional marketing approval method, resulting in EU approving 2-3 weeks later.
UK gave emergency use approval to AstraZeneca on 30 December.
UK gave emergency use approval to AstraZeneca on 30 December.
When gave conditional marketing approval to AstraZeneca on 29 Jan, the company informed EU it would not be meeting original dosage delivery promise because of production problems in EU plant. Seems doses to be reserved for had gone to
The battle between EU & AZ began
gave conditional marketing approval to AstraZeneca on 29 Jan, the company informed EU it would not be meeting original dosage delivery promise because of production problems in EU plant. Seems doses to be reserved for had gone to The battle between EU & AZ began
The Commission said AZ signed a contract saying it would use all 4 of its production facilities, 2 in UK and 2 in EU, to deliver to EU - so the shortfall should be made up with exports from the UK.
AZ's CEO said they couldn't because of a 'UK 1st' clause. https://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2021/01/26/news/interview_pascal_soriot_ceo_astrazeneca_coronavirus_covid_vaccines-284349628/
AZ's CEO said they couldn't because of a 'UK 1st' clause. https://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2021/01/26/news/interview_pascal_soriot_ceo_astrazeneca_coronavirus_covid_vaccines-284349628/
That battle has raged on without resolution. AZ will only deliver 30m out of promised 80m for Q1 and 70m of promised 180m in Q2, EC says.
Meanwhile EU has exported 10m (mostly Pfizer) doses to UK, while 'UK 1st' clause stops AZ from meeting EU delivery promise from UK plants.
Meanwhile EU has exported 10m (mostly Pfizer) doses to UK, while 'UK 1st' clause stops AZ from meeting EU delivery promise from UK plants.
Across the pond, the US export ban has meant 
,
&
have to get their Pfizer doses from EU plants instead. ( has exported 4.6m doses to , 3.8m to , 4m to )
Situation particularly absurd for, which must get its Pfizer from Belgium instead of next door in Michigan.
,& have to get their Pfizer doses from EU plants instead. ( has exported 4.6m doses to , 3.8m to , 4m to )Situation particularly absurd for
, which must get its Pfizer from Belgium instead of next door in Michigan.
Even US has received vaccine exports from EU: 1 million in February, and 3.9 million doses of Johnson & Johnson a few weeks ago according to the NYT.
J&J doses made in US can't go to EU.
Overall it appears EU has exported half the doses made here. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/28/world/cdc-johnson-and-johnson-vaccine.html
J&J doses made in US can't go to EU.
Overall it appears EU has exported half the doses made here. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/28/world/cdc-johnson-and-johnson-vaccine.html
These export numbers were revealed last week and Europeans were furious.
In was in this context President Von Der Leyen said on Wednesday the EU is considering an export ban to vaccine-producing countries who don't reciprocate.
Germany, France and Italy are pushing this idea.
In was in this context President Von Der Leyen said on Wednesday the EU is considering an export ban to vaccine-producing countries who don't reciprocate.
Germany, France and Italy are pushing this idea.
What mistakes did EU make? To me it seems obvious.
took decisions based on an assumption of a free market and good faith from its partners. They didn’t think forcing an EU partner on BioNTech was essential, or EU plants should be for Europeans 1st.
That now appears naive.
took decisions based on an assumption of a free market and good faith from its partners. They didn’t think forcing an EU partner on BioNTech was essential, or EU plants should be for Europeans 1st.That now appears naive.
EU assumed good behavior. US & UK manoeuvred to benefit themselves.
Many EU countries flubbed vaccine rollouts. EU negotiations & approval maybe took too long.
But what's striking is, for many in US & UK there seems to be 1 set of rules for them and another for everyone else.
Many EU countries flubbed vaccine rollouts. EU negotiations & approval maybe took too long.
But what's striking is, for many in US & UK there seems to be 1 set of rules for them and another for everyone else.
