Read on Twitter
By what name, under what heading, is it permissible to advocate for the rights of female people? https://twitter.com/KateVWilliams/status/1353321753775374337">https://twitter.com/KateVWill...
Is there *any* configuration—no matter how objectionable gender-critical women might find it—that would be tolerable to and respected by trans activists? AFAB rights? Movement for the liberation of the & #39;transmisogyny-exempt& #39;? Non-males of the world unite?
Or is there truly *no* heading under which The People Formerly Known as Women and Girls can gather that trans activists won& #39;t put under siege?
(My guess? There& #39;s no acceptable form or frame for a female-centered movement.)
(My guess? There& #39;s no acceptable form or frame for a female-centered movement.)
What& #39;s unacceptable to trans activists isn& #39;t the language we use to refer to women as a sex class. Don& #39;t be fooled by how much trans activists focus on policing our language. What& #39;s unacceptable is acknowledging women as a sex class, no matter what words we use.
It& #39;s drawing boundaries around our bodies and experiences, no matter how we refer to those bodies or experiences. The target of trans activism is any acknowledgement of sex difference.
