Including a convicted pedophile lacks judgment—financially benefiting is disqualifying from public leadership. https://thetech.com/2019/09/12/lander-denies-epstein-association-despite-photos
Is there a better way to undermine trust in science—or to signal who does not matter than to nominate someone affiliated with Epstein & very recently toasted one of the most famous racist & misogynist scientists?!? I just......

https://www.statnews.com/2018/05/17/james-watson-birthday-party-lander-toast/



The Many Controversies Surrounding Biden’s Pick For Science Adviser https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/eric-lander-biden-science-adviser Weird how many of these controversies involve dishonesty, denying credit to women & BIPOC—& including &/or publicly admiring men who intentionally exclude women/BIPOC by design & intention
Disappointed & concerned that https://www.commerce.senate.gov/members WILL consider Eric Lander's OSTP nomination on 4/29.
Women & BIPOC in science deserve better-please urge @SenatorCantwell @EdMarkey @SenDuckworth @ReverendWarnock &
to vote NO https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2021/4/nomination-hearing/cfae127c-0c1f-4e0d-8492-32ba7671c3c9 cc @page88 @xeni @heathr
Women & BIPOC in science deserve better-please urge @SenatorCantwell @EdMarkey @SenDuckworth @ReverendWarnock &

As @500womensci aptly put it “Eric Lander Is Not the Ideal Choice for Presidential Science Adviser”
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/eric-lander-is-not-the-ideal-choice-for-presidential-science-adviser/ Do Dems think the GOP’ll ignore Lander’s continued dishonesty about Epstein? Shouldn’t OSTP’s leader be known for including women & BIPOC—& not eugenicists?
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/eric-lander-is-not-the-ideal-choice-for-presidential-science-adviser/ Do Dems think the GOP’ll ignore Lander’s continued dishonesty about Epstein? Shouldn’t OSTP’s leader be known for including women & BIPOC—& not eugenicists?