BREAKING: One of the Affiants in the complaint filed by @SidneyPowell1 explained that she observed a batch of utterly pristine ballots: "Most of the ballots had already been handled; they had been written on by people, and the edges were worn. They showed obvious use. However,

2. one batch stood out. It was pristine. There was a difference in the texture of the paper - it was if they were intended for absentee use but had not been used for that purpose. There was a difference in the feel. These different ballots included a slight depressed pre-fold so

3. they could be easily folded and unfolded for use in the scanning machines. There were no markings on the ballots to show where they had come from, or where they had been processed. These stood out. In my 20 years of experience of handling ballots, I observed that the markings

4. for the candidates on these ballots were unusually uniform, perhaps even with a ballot-marking device. By my estimate in observing these ballots, approximately 98% constituted votes for Joe Biden. I only observed two of these ballots as votes for President Donald J. Trump.

5. "The same Affiant further testified specifically to the breach of the chain of custody of the voting machines the night before the election stating: we typically receive the machines, the ballot marking devices – on the Friday before the election, with a chain of custody

6. letter to be signed on Sunday, indicating that we had received the machines and the counts on the machines when received, and that the machines have been sealed. In this case, we were asked to sign the chain of custody letter on Sunday, even though the machines were not

7. delivered until 2:00 AM in the morning on Election Day. The Milton precinct received its machines at 1:00 AM in the morning on Election Day. This is unacceptable and voting machines should [not] be out of custody prior to an Election Day.

8. EVEN WORSE!

“when we did receive the machines, they WERE NOT SEALED OR LOCKED, the serial numbers WERE NOT what were reflected on the related documentation…” [emphasis mine].