Couple observations from the Gettysburg "fraud" conference.

1. Many of the "experts" speaking are new recruits, first timers, angry their "suggestions" were ignored.

2. No evidence of fraud.

3. Dislike for a process they appear to have been observing for the very first time.

4. Data "warfare" expert doesn't like automated devices in general, more Hugo Chavez talk.

5. MUCH "this is the way it should be" in our elections system, and no claims it's any different from any previous election.

6. A lot of the new recruits felt they were treated extremely rudely when they attempted to tell election workers how to do things differently.