I& #39;d think that the pay-wallers are reading this wrong. In the sense that they& #39;re looking to exploit the surfeit of BS, by assuming that people would pay for what& #39;s not.

The problem is that a lot of people cannot tell what& #39;s BS and what& #39;s not. If they could, this might work.
+ https://twitter.com/MindofManish/status/1331458156984107008">https://twitter.com/MindofMan...

What one could do is to abstract or summarize the non-BS stuff into an easy-to-parse open-access piece, with the full piece and associated links (if any) on pay-per-view/subscription credits etc.

A bit like the abstracts in reputed research journals. Sure, there can be ... +

... better ways of thinking about this and different approaches, but the point remains the same.

The & #39;good& #39; work must be available - at least in essence - as freely as the nonsense.