Bunch of law profs pile on in the 3d Cir.: "For the good of the country, for the good of the Constitution, for the good of democracy, and for the good of all the voters who did all the law required of them to cast lawful ballots, the Court should reject Trump's challenge."

(Among the group are Erwin Chemerinsky, @LeahLitman, @marinklevy.)

The brief is about remedies. Whatever else is going on with Trump's lawsuit, they say, he can't just overturn the results of an election. That would "subvert democracy, undermine federalism, and threaten the orderly transfer of power."

Dunno about this. Al Gore comes to mind. (Though that litigation was about what the election result was and how a recount should be conducted, which isn't remotely like Trump saying it should be tossed aside.)