(okay, last thread, I swear, this closes out the topic)

~But Fog, I hear you say, what of the divinity of Jesus? Well, there it gets tricky. If my fumbling here is anything akin to the truth, Jesus could still be fully God- the Spirit incarnate, half of the Divine Brain. If so, then consider:~

~He has returned to sit AT THE RIGHT HAND OF THE FATHER. This seems to me not as at odds with traditional Christian doctrine as it might sound, but still understandably too far off to be accepted as sound doctrine by any major sect.~

~This places Jesus as the feminine archetype literarily (not calling Jesus a woman, it’s theme, please don’t hurt me), for He performs the classical heroine’s story arc of taming the tyrant. God the Father, then, destroys the serpent.~

~The serpent as always represents chaos, which here equates to sin: anything outside of the perfect structure of the Father is negative change or chaos. The wrath of the Father in the crucifixion effectively deals with that sin in terms of mortal combat,~

~which follows the masculine archetype’s heroic journey to its conclusion. So we have the two halves of what we know as a ‘consciousness’ or ‘being’, enacting the story humanity has distilled as having ‘worth’ or ‘meaning’. ~

~As to the human element of Jesus, He needs not be different (except in sinlessness) from the rest of us. After all, we are to be co-heirs with Him, and also to experience the same unity with God that He does; we too will be the physical vessel of the Spirit.~

~So there’s my argument for the Duality of God. It started as a thought-experiment, but it’s blossomed rather, into my own little personal heretical view. Feel free to try and convert me; you might succeed, and anyway I’m sure we’d hit it off.~

~Thanks for sticking with me through this lengthy lecture. Ta ta and also CLACK CLACK.~ (end of thread)