Gun control thread.

Will go over all the justifications for gun ownership and the lack of empirical basis for said justifications.

This thread applies to capitalists and anti capitalists

1/a lot
Preface
- homicide
- suicide
- mass shootings

The justifications that I will go over are
- home/self defense
- defense of others
- Feelings of safety
- overthrowing the government/revolution
- deterring tyranny and oppression
- hunting/rural life
- collecting/recreation/sport
PREFACE
V
Scope of yearly deaths

1a. of American deaths per year, firearm suicides represent 1 in 120 (22938/2744248=0.836%), firearm homicides 1 in 190 (22938/2744248=0.525%), and other firearm injuries 1 in 2100 ((38658-(22938+14415))/2744248=0.0476%): https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_05.pdf
Economic cost of firearm proliferation

Extreme cost incurred

2a. firearm injury costs are $174.1 billion per year: https://www.childrenssafetynetwork.org/sites/childrenssafetynetwork.org/files/TheCostofGunViolence.pdf

2b. firearm injury hospitalization costs to victims alone are $17.7 billion per year: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0039606014000609 https://sci-hub.st/10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.011
Homicide

The overwhelming amount of evidence points towards a correlative and a causal relationship between firearms proliferation and increased homicide
3a. firearm prevalence 1981-2010 significantly positively correlates with firearm homicide and overall homicide
http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302042 https://sci-hub.st/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302042

controls
v
3b. firearm prevalence 2001-2002 and 2004 significantly positively correlates with overall homicide
https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(15)00072-0/pdf https://sci-hub.st/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.008

controls
v
3c. firearm prevalence 1981-2013 significantly positively correlates with firearm homicide and insignificantly with non-firearm homicide (implying overall increase in homicide)
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/vio.2015.0047 https://sci-hub.st/10.1089/vio.2015.0047

controls
v
3d. firearm prevalence correlates with overall violent crime: http://www.cjcj.org/uploads/cjcj/documents/jpj_firearm_ownership.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20171013095732/http://www.cjcj.org/uploads/cjcj/documents/jpj_firearm_ownership.pdf The current analysis used suicide by firearm as a proxy for gun ownership. Examining violent crime, homicide, rape, robbery, and assault for 1,997 counties

controls
v
Suicide

The overwhelming amount of evidence points towards a correlative and a causal relationship between firearms proliferation and increased suicide
4b. 1% increase of firearm prevalence correlates with a 1.4% increase of overall suicide
https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00005373-200704000-00031 https://sci-hub.st/10.1097/01.ta.0000198214.24056.40

controls
v
4c. males with a firearm in the household have a suicide rate 10x that of those that don't: https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/160/10/929/140858 https://sci-hub.st/10.1093/aje/kwh309

controls
v
4e. suicides by firearm are much more effective: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-matter/case-fatality/
https://sci-hub.st/10.2105/ajph.90.12.1885
4f. firearms are more fatal than other methods; if the US had comparable firearm prevalence as other countries, it would have 20-38% fewer suicides
http://archive.is/mAcn3 
Mass shootings

The overwhelming amount of evidence points towards a correlative and a causal relationship between firearms proliferation and increased mass shooting frequency
5a. higher gun ownership & looser gun laws correlate with higher mass shootings: https://www.bmj.com/content/364/bmj.l542 Mass shootings were defined as independent events in which four or more people were killed by a firearm.
1998-2015
mass shooting addendum

type of firearm and cartridge sizes available matter

5b. higher fatalities and higher woundings occur in active shooter incidents with a semiautomatic rifle than those without: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2702134 https://sci-hub.st/10.1001/jama.2018.11009
JUSTIFICATION DEBUNKS
V
Self defense

Current available data on defensive firearm use suggests that instances of use are rare and usage in said instances does not make you statistically safer overall
Scope

1a. Defensive use of firearms is way rare than most people believe

why to prefer the NCVS to the Kleck data: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/more-guns-do-not-stop-more-crimes-evidence-shows/ http://archive.is/h6MEI 
Kleck's data is self-reported, which introduces bias
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/1861/understanding-and-preventing-violence-volume-1
1b. Between 2003 and 2007, approximately 2.1 million household
burglaries were reported to the FBI each year on average.
Household burglaries ending in homicide made up 0.004% of all
burglaries during that period.
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ascii/vdhb.txt
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/library/2015/11/17/Dimaya_Victimization.pdf
27.6% of the time, a person is home while the burglary occurs; 26% of those people home are harmed. That means 7.2% of burglaries result in someone being injured.
https://tinyurl.com/y48xkg62 
0.004% chance of death
0.65% chance of getting seriously injured
0.22% chance of being raped
Efficacy

Guns don't make you safer in defensive scenarios
1a. defensive firearm use occurred in just 0.9% of crimes that had a victim; After any protective action, 4.2% of victims were injured; after SDGU, 4.1% of victims were injured. significantly reduced property loss
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743515001188 https://sci-hub.st/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.029
1b. high gun ownership in neighborhoods do not deter home break ins
https://www.nber.org/papers/w8926 
no support for a net deterrent effect from widespread gun ownership. Analysis concludes that residential burglary rates tend to increase with community gun prevalence.
Defense of others (good guy with a gun)

1a. 3.1% (5 cases) of active shooter scenarios were ended by an armed non law enforcement individual from 2000 to 2013
https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-study-2000-2013-1.pdf
Does not make up for increased homicides and violence that come with carry laws
1b. right to carry laws are associated with 13-15% higher overall violent crime rates 10 years after adoption: http://www.nber.org/papers/w23510.pdf
1c. unrestricted concealed carry and shall-issue concealed carry laws were associated with 4.4%-6.5% higher overall homicides per capita: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304057 https://sci-hub.st/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304057
Feeling safer (more qualitative)

liberal vs conservative demographic changes intersecting with feelings of comfort regarding firearms
1a. conservatives feel greater personal control when imagining holding a firearm; liberals do not; conservatives feel that an armed civilian entering a public shooting makes the situation less chaotic, while liberals feel it makes it more chaotic:
https://sci-hub.st/10.1086/695761 
1b. country is becoming increasingly liberal and increasingly anti gun, meaning more people are becoming uncomfortable around guns
Deterring tyranny and oppression/revolution

Current data indicates that levels of gun ownerships do not correlated with levels of freedom or a states willingness to oppress its citizenry
2a. revolutions are actually more likely in states with lower firearm ownership (probably spurious, but may be relevant) -- poorer places have fewer guns and more revolutions.
3a. Civil resistance is more effective than violent resistance at regime change, policy change and other changes.
(Chenowith and Stefan 2011)
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/02/why-nonviolent-resistance-beats-violent-force-in-effecting-social-political-change/
movement success is positively predicted by nonviolence and number of participants
Hunting/Rural life

Arguments can be made for niche firearm use in self defense against animals such as wild boar herds and bears that I believe can be justified as violent crime in rural as the risk with gun ownership would be more niche and rare in rural communities.
It should still be more limited than what it is as there is limited data on the extent and scope on defensive firearm usage against animals and other methods of deterrence from animals have been proven more effective such as with bear mace
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c13e2e48f51309499864d1d/t/5cae42fbeef1a10d92b12d77/1554924284110/Efficacy_of_Firearms_for_Bear_Deterrence.pdf
I am morally vegan and none of this would matter anyway as I prescribe urbanization and catch, spay and release methods of population control over hunting.

Killing animals is something that is avoidable
Collecting and recreation

I have no moral objection to collecting and recreation so long as it is heavily regulated by the state and ammo couldn't be kept in the home like in Switzerland.

I would like state ran and operated gun ranges where you can store your guns.
I might add more stuff later but for now

THIS IS THE END OF THE THREAD
@benjaminpolitix fight me fool
You can follow @RedCharlotte_.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: