I’ve asked SAGE if they would kindly deposit in the public domain the trove of information they’ve used to create their model relating to the so-called “2nd wave”. I ask because I can’t find any foundational literature on this field. Just post-WW1 stories. There is surely much...

...more. Where is it? I think most people would expect that the premier team advising Govt is using more than Wikipedia to inform their “2nd wave” model? So what published scientific literature are they resting their predictions upon? If they will not share this, I conclude...

...that they’ve no such evidence for “2nd waves”. I’m asking because I’m unaware of any scientific principles or medical experience relating to such ‘waves’. There’s some seasonality, but that’s not what SAGE means. Theirs has a peak in spring & total lethal impact twice as...

...large as the initial pandemic phase. I’ve been known to say “viruses don’t do waves”. Let’s all hope they’ve not been making this all up. Show us the evidence.
My first major concern arose when, in late spring, all the media & several SAGE members started warning of...

....”2nd waves”, even though there’s no precedent, theory or literature indicating this was even possible, let Aline likely. Yet soon, prodigious amounts of money began flowing into setting up very large PCR testing centres, at a time when the virus in U.K. showed every sign...

...of fading away below the point where prevalence could even be determined accurately. Up to that point, PCR testing capacity might have been limited, but there wasn’t significant concern about the reliability of the testing. Many labs were involved, and everyone had the right..

...skills to be running these technically very difficult tests. Now we’ve “Lighthouse Labs” running over >350K tests per day. Are they hunting down “2nd waves” (which don’t happen) or inadvertently creating them?
Before we question testing, let’s see the literature. Now, please.