A thread of some highlights from the "independent report" commissioned by #kwasizabantu. Just before the weekend, a glowing "summary of findings" was released. After the weekend, reasons for delaying the main report became apparent. https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2020-11-21-lawyers-kwasizabantu-probe-clears-mission-of-string-of-allegations/">https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/sout...
We start off with a disclaimer. The panelists say they are not properly qualified on what appears to be the primary question facing them: Whether or not Kwasizabantu is a cult. And that they "also had very limited time".
For academic guidance on what a cult is, why would an independent panel choose to consult academics with links to Kwasizabantu?
Did you know Kwasizabantu used to have a description of cults/sects on its website, until it was discovered and shared by insiders? It appears the panel didn& #39;t ask them why it was removed. https://web.archive.org/web/20190927211125/https:/www.ksb.org.za/10-marks-of-a-sect/">https://web.archive.org/web/20190...
An accurate conclusion at the end of the section on "control over thoughts". Now if only they would think through the viscous consequences that ensue for dissenters.
Perhaps it& #39;s rather "everyone who doesn& #39;t spontaneously adhere to the slavish rules and regulations is quickly made into a former member".
OR.... it could be that those who do not conform are excommunicated. Did the panelists forget the hypothesis/allegation they were testing?
Marriage and dating at Kwasizabantu. Would have been more complete with a picture of Erlo Stegen standing between the couple.
Those who charm you and help you avoid painful truths don& #39;t.
I didn& #39;t want to address this in public and I really can& #39;t understand why the panel approached neither me nor my wife to test this privately first.
This is not a metric for recognizing a cult. Did you know that the People& #39;s Temple members were exuberantly cheering Jim Jones the evening before they drank the kool-aid?