Read on Twitter
This week, all of America is Farhad Manjoo - carefully assessing the risk of infection of a family Thanksgiving, determining the risk is not worth it, then going ahead anyway. JUST LIKE COUPLES IN VOWS WHO SCALE THEIR 300-PERSON WEDDINGS TO 75 PEOPLE AS IF THAT WEREN& #39;T STILL BAD.
So, since the New York Times doesn& #39;t have the sense of public duty to stop fawning over superspreader events, let& #39;s come together to mock them! Let& #39;s read Vows!
Maybe I spoke too soon about the Times& #39;s sense of duty? Look at this shade-throwing caption! That is the public service journalism I need!
Does this mean he& #39;s DEA or ICE? Either way, thumbs down.
Fact check: no.
This is very bad.
THIS IS EXACTLY WRONG.
I have truly never wished for less joy at a wedding.
There are circumstances when even a small wedding can be a superspreader event.
"Back when my dad was only responsible for disease outbreaks in Indiana."
This is how all things happen.
Fact check: no.
Dude. Same.
Do people who study classics love Roman emperors? Does anyone actually just love ALL Roman emperors?
New York Timesiest Sentence of the Week
Terrible. Why? Just why?
So a funny thing that happened is that I moderated a discussion about Covid last week and three different public health experts, two of them from Yale, where this dope went, all said rapid tests can miss the virus when it& #39;s transmissible.
Loathsome.
Huh. That was never my experience when I had to cut through Harvard Yard to get home.
Service journalism at its finest.
Wow. Big Governor of South Dakota energy.
I can& #39;t even explain why this misunderstanding is so hilarious, but it is.
This lady wouldn& #39;t share sunscreen with a dude because he had a rash from shingles, but she gathered her friends and family for a rehearsal dinner in the middle of a goddamn pandemic. We& #39;re doomed.
This is a very bad sentence and Vows needs to hire back their copy editor.
This is ... not proof of generosity of spirit.
