So apparently there& #39;s a new formula for converting from dog years into human years. https://www.sciencemag.org/.../here-s-better-way-convert...
The">https://www.sciencemag.org/.../here-... equation is H = 16*ln(D) +31, where D is the dog& #39;s age and H is the corresponding human age. Does it work?
(short thread, 1/5)
The">https://www.sciencemag.org/.../here-... equation is H = 16*ln(D) +31, where D is the dog& #39;s age and H is the corresponding human age. Does it work?
(short thread, 1/5)
According to the above, at the moment of birth (when dog age = 0), a dog is *negative infinity* human years old. That would imply all dogs are immortal, which is wrong.
2/5
2/5
At 1 day old, the dog is *negative* 65 in human years. Wrong again.
3/5
3/5
The human age of 100 years corresponds to 74 years old for a dog. Lots of humans live to 100. No dog have ever got to be 74; wrong again.
4/5
4/5
Maybe it& #39;s applicable in some limited range? Certainly not applicable for the human lifespan of 0 to 100.
5/5
5/5
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/11/here-s-better-way-convert-dog-years-human-years-scientists-say
Seems">https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019... the link is broken in (1/5) above. Sorry; this is my first tome trying to make a "thread".
6/5
Seems">https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019... the link is broken in (1/5) above. Sorry; this is my first tome trying to make a "thread".
6/5