Read on Twitter
This opinion by Judge Matthew Brann, dismissing another Trump Campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania, is very well-written
I'd encourage everyone to read it; it explains some of the key laws and precedents quite well
Via @marceelias / @DemocracyDocket:
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Order-Granting-MTD.pdf
I'd encourage everyone to read it; it explains some of the key laws and precedents quite well
Via @marceelias / @DemocracyDocket:
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Order-Granting-MTD.pdf
Because there's nothing for SCOTUS to do
If they affirm the decision, nothing changes
If they reverse – which simply won't happen on an evidentiary record like what the Trump people have put together – Dems in Congress object to counting the EVs https://twitter.com/cyndi1174/status/1330329680562544640
If they affirm the decision, nothing changes If they reverse – which simply won't happen on an evidentiary record like what the Trump people have put together – Dems in Congress object to counting the EVs https://twitter.com/cyndi1174/status/1330329680562544640
No. First appeal is "as of right" / must be heard. Everything after that (en banc review, SCOTUS) is optional https://twitter.com/guidov999/status/1330330507138256899
This thread from @bradheath – who I've followed for years now, and you should too – expertly details why this case is going nowhere on appeal https://twitter.com/bradheath/status/1330322900960808960
