This opinion by Judge Matthew Brann, dismissing another Trump Campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania, is very well-written

I'd encourage everyone to read it; it explains some of the key laws and precedents quite well

Via @marceelias / @DemocracyDocket:
Because there's nothing for SCOTUS to do

➡️ If they affirm the decision, nothing changes

➡️ If they reverse – which simply won't happen on an evidentiary record like what the Trump people have put together – Dems in Congress object to counting the EVs
No. First appeal is "as of right" / must be heard. Everything after that (en banc review, SCOTUS) is optional
This thread from @bradheath – who I've followed for years now, and you should too – expertly details why this case is going nowhere on appeal
You can follow @greg_doucette.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: