We need to talk about social-emotional learning.

I know a family whose child is seriously struggling right now. So I am sympathetic to amazing school efforts, and parents seeking help.

But the social-emotional learning agenda isn't entirely about helping them...
The SEL movement is also animated by this cost-benefit algorithm. Your children's emotions are now economic material to be optimised. https://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/rulesforengagement/SEL-Revised.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiaqKSK55TtAhVPQUEAHTnLAVoQFjACegQIBRAF&usg=AOvVaw0ZrnBTuUyo-an9Cph0lmy3
And it seemed like social-emotional learning was a switch away from international comparative tests? Nope. OECD is testing children at 10 and 15 to compare their SEL skills. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/social-emotional-skills-study/
My schildren are experiencing a program with colour-coded emotion "cogs". But are emotions categorizable? How we think of emotions is historically situated too. "Cogs" are a new way of thinking. Emotions aren't separate from the tools used to measure them. https://projects.history.qmul.ac.uk/emotions/ 
Finally, plenty of orgs want to assess children's emotions with biometric, facial vision and other tech. Based on assumption "basic emotions" can be captured, culture-free and separable from the apparatus that assesses them.
So children's emotional states are a big concern. The SEL movement has much to offer. But let's not be naive. There are controversial issues regarding the science, economics, and politics involved in evaluating and treating children's emotions.
You can follow @BenPatrickWill.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: