BREAKING - FINALLY

ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 127 135 140 145 161 165 motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint are GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE. NO LEAVE TO AMEND IS GRANTED
https://ecf.pamd.uscourts.gov/doc1/15517440657

“Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint & unsupported by evidence..this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its 6th most populated state

Link to the Court’s Memorandum and boy did Rudy fresh & fruity get completely excoriated

https://ecf.pamd.uscourts.gov/doc1/15517440654

SAVAGE
“As of the day of this Memorandum Opinion
Biden/Harris ticket had received 3,454,444 votes, and the Trump/Pence ticket had received 3,373,488 votes, giving the Biden ticket a lead of more than 80,000 votes,
per the...state elections return website“
https://ecf.pamd.uscourts.gov/doc1/15517440657

Pages 7-11 provide a concise tick rock to all the actions, attorney withdrawals/addition, motions, briefing schedule and explains how the 3rdCCOAs BOGNET was the controlling legal framework as it relates to standing
stay with me because it’s gonna a GOOD
https://ecf.pamd.uscourts.gov/doc1/15517440657

OH. DEAR. ME
-only remaining claim violation of equal protection
-This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together from 2 distinct theories in an attempt to avoid controlling precedent (BOGNET)
https://ecf.pamd.uscourts.gov/doc1/15517440657

The FOOTNOTE is GLORIOUS and presently I’m howling because it is that funny
and the fact the Judge took the time to tuck 3 fact nuggets in that footnote is why this is just a wholesale rejection of Rudy Fresh-n-Fruity
https://ecf.pamd.uscourts.gov/doc1/15517440657

I am DECEASED & tweeting this from the “beyond”
the footnotes are SO good
“they fail to establish that it was Defendants who caused these injuries and that their purported injury of vote-denial is adequately redressed by invalidating the votes of other...”
https://ecf.pamd.uscourts.gov/doc1/15517440657

Court found they met the standing threshold BUT failed to link tp Defendant’s actions
causation
Redressability
Prohibiting certification of the election results would
not reinstate the Individual Plaintiffs’ right to vote
-simply deny more > 6.8M people their right to vote

Trump Campaign 1st posits “as a political committee for a federal candidate,” it has “Article III standing to bring this action”
OUCH
this claim is incorrect
”does not obviate the need for an injury-in-fact, nor does it automatically satisfy the other two elements of standing.“

Just “embrace the suck” Donald - just do it
At this point what do I see next?
DJT Inc might file an immediate appeal but I cant see how the 3rdCCOA would agree especially in light of BOGNET
here I uploaded the Ruling/Memo to a Public Drive

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F4xVP9FsBN1yDBhaNkg9e18QG6yORXst/view?usp=drivesdk

Quick Summary - DJT Inc asked this Court to;
-invalidate >6.8M lawful ballots
-delay certification over TWO lawfully “canceled ballots“
-ignore the 3rdCCOA precedence re BOGNET
in short @realDonaldTrump is the BIGGEST BADDEST LOSER and he’s a sore loser at that
-mic drop