Trump& #39;s lawyers said the other day that the press refuses to look at all the evidence the president and his allies have put forward of a massive scheme to rig the election.
I did.
Georgia edition, from the case filed by Trump ally L. Lin Wood ->
I did.
Georgia edition, from the case filed by Trump ally L. Lin Wood ->
Exhibit A: A witness declares she was "not close enough to see much of anything" during Georgia& #39;s recount.
Exhibit B: A witness declares that people conducting the recount were not great at math. Also, sometimes ballots were left unattended on a table and drinks also were left on those tables.
Exhibit C: A witness says she observed a batch of "pristine" ballots during the recount, with markings that were "uniform." Most, but not all, were votes for Biden.
Exhibit D: A witness says people weren& #39;t verifying signatures on ballots (which aren& #39;t signed). Some ballots were neatly-bubbled, and only had Biden votes. Some numbers didn& #39;t add up. Therefore he believes "there was widespread fraud favoring Joseph Biden."
Exhibit E: A witness says "hundreds" of ballots "seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases," and were neatly filled out for Biden. Also, counters didn& #39;t verify signatures on the ballots (which aren& #39;t signed). "Based on my observations I believe there was fraud committed."
Exhibit F: Sometimes ballots were recounted without being checked by two workers. (Also, some workers were rude and he had to get someone to tweet about them.)
Exhibit G: Ballots were improperly placed in tray marked for Joe Biden (but she couldn& #39;t see for whom they were marked). Operations were "sloppy, unorganized and suspicious."