Trump's lawyers said the other day that the press refuses to look at all the evidence the president and his allies have put forward of a massive scheme to rig the election.

I did.

Georgia edition, from the case filed by Trump ally L. Lin Wood ->

Exhibit A: A witness declares she was "not close enough to see much of anything" during Georgia's recount.

Exhibit B: A witness declares that people conducting the recount were not great at math. Also, sometimes ballots were left unattended on a table and drinks also were left on those tables.

Exhibit C: A witness says she observed a batch of "pristine" ballots during the recount, with markings that were "uniform." Most, but not all, were votes for Biden.

Exhibit D: A witness says people weren't verifying signatures on ballots (which aren't signed). Some ballots were neatly-bubbled, and only had Biden votes. Some numbers didn't add up. Therefore he believes "there was widespread fraud favoring Joseph Biden."

Exhibit E: A witness says "hundreds" of ballots "seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases," and were neatly filled out for Biden. Also, counters didn't verify signatures on the ballots (which aren't signed). "Based on my observations I believe there was fraud committed."

Exhibit F: Sometimes ballots were recounted without being checked by two workers. (Also, some workers were rude and he had to get someone to tweet about them.)

Exhibit G: Ballots were improperly placed in tray marked for Joe Biden (but she couldn't see for whom they were marked). Operations were "sloppy, unorganized and suspicious."

Exhibit H: A witness says he observed ballots with "a perfect black bubble" (and he was able to "observe the perfect bubble for a few minutes"). He saw a counter go through 500 Biden ballots in a row. A poll worker told him he was under pressure, and "there is widespread fraud."