Read on Twitter
I *really* shouldn't spend my Sunday mornings doing this but as a journalist whose job is to dig into things decided to take a look at these numbers... (v short thread)
So 840 people aged 101+. Sounds like a lot, yeah? https://twitter.com/PhillyGOP/status/1325175978641874947
So 840 people aged 101+. Sounds like a lot, yeah? https://twitter.com/PhillyGOP/status/1325175978641874947
There were 13,170 centenarians in UK in 2018 according to ONS. Pennsylvania population is c12m, roughly 5 times UK's. So would expect around 2,500 people aged 101+ in PA. Is it a huge surprise that c. a third of these voted?
But 'lived through Civil war' and 'born in 1800s' is just 'wow', right?
Well no. It's is literally laid out in GOP link:
"The reason some birth dates will display as 1/1/1800 is due to confidentiality reasons"
https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-General-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/mcba-yywm/data
Well no. It's is literally laid out in GOP link:
"The reason some birth dates will display as 1/1/1800 is due to confidentiality reasons"
https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficiency-Citizen-Engagement/2020-General-Election-Mail-Ballot-Requests-Departm/mcba-yywm/data
This stuff isn't even complicated. It just depends on people sharing it without even spending a minute looking at the data supplied or asking *any* even vaguely critical questions.
