Read on Twitter
Obama/Biden Admin spent six months chasing the Russia Collusion hoax.
Brennon/Clapper both admitted that they had nothing by 1/20/17. Yet @Comey went ahead for 5 more months.
Then Mueller looked at it for 22 months.
We can’t spend a few weeks to look at ballot integrity? Pls!
Brennon/Clapper both admitted that they had nothing by 1/20/17. Yet @Comey went ahead for 5 more months.
Then Mueller looked at it for 22 months.
We can’t spend a few weeks to look at ballot integrity? Pls!
Electors vote mid-December. The rush to claim Biden a winner now (when it can be done in a month or more from now) is a tactic to weaken any calls to review ballots in WI, GA, AZ and PA. It is designed to increase GOP calls that Trump should join the call for a “graceful exit.”
The @TeamTrump PR claim (not sure if it will work out this way):
“We will win AZ and GA outright or after a (hand) recount of all mail in ballots or at a minimum mail ins in counties that used the same software that caused an (alleged) anti-Trump glitch in MI. With AZ/GA aside,
“We will win AZ and GA outright or after a (hand) recount of all mail in ballots or at a minimum mail ins in counties that used the same software that caused an (alleged) anti-Trump glitch in MI. With AZ/GA aside,
“Biden has 279 thanks to PA and WI. We want a (hand) recount of mail ins in those two states too in addition to other challenges in PA. Electors vote only mid-December. There is enough time over the next 4-5 weeks to assure ballot integrity in key states.”
Simple messaging.
Simple messaging.
“If @JoeBiden is confidant in the ballots he should welcome a hand recount of mail ins in AZ, GA, WI & PA. Electors don’t vote until mid-December. Latest a week into the hand count a pattern of integrity or fraud will emerge. Rejecting a count leaves a cloud over the results.”
Alleged experts at Reuters and AP confirm that “voter fraud of any kind is exceedingly rare in the US.”
Not sure if it’s rare or just not investigated enough. Look at the pushback Trump is facing for asking for a review.
In Paterson NJ, a new election was called due to fraud.
Not sure if it’s rare or just not investigated enough. Look at the pushback Trump is facing for asking for a review.
In Paterson NJ, a new election was called due to fraud.
A local GOPer in MI first “lost” his seat by 104 votes but he then won it by 1,127 votes after a glitch was found.
From 104 to 1,127.
In just one small race this cycle.
Narrow swing states need recounts/audits to certify that they are legit. https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/oakland/2020/11/06/oakland-county-election-2020-race-results/6184186002/">https://www.freep.com/story/new...
