The use of the image of Corbyn not-wearing-his-mask-properly is interesting, and the juxtaposition of badly-masked Corbyn with unmasked Starmer here is fascinating in terms of projections of competence, authority, accountability https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/oct/30/labour-keir-starmer-disappointed-jeremy-corbyn-response-ehrc-antisemitism-report">https://www.theguardian.com/politics/...

https://twitter.com/samwetherell/status/1279465136118513665">https://twitter.com/samwether...

https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1318233073176268801">https://twitter.com/bbclaurak...

Oh look who The Scotsman have chosen to use to illustrate this piece about people not wearing face coverings properly on public transport in Scotland https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/covid-why-scotland-needs-campaign-get-people-wear-face-masks-properly-laura-waddell-3024808">https://www.scotsman.com/news/opin...

Again, fascinating decision to illustrate report of an investigation into an investigation with an image of a not-quite-properly-masked Jeremy Corbyn https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/nov/22/labour-infighting-inquiry-damaging-starmers-position">https://www.theguardian.com/politics/...

The literalism of politicians-in-PPE (Literally Highly Visible Politicians) surely saturates this imagery: Corbyn unmasked, what& #39;s behind the mask, "a real mask-off moment"; supplementary to the (fascinating) way in which Starmer as not-masked, Corbyn as badly-masked, plays out