Read on Twitter
The problem is that, often for us, a lot of our ideas start more as little fragments that we know have a common thread to them, but it's very hard to find out where those threads lead to, actually.
From what we've seen, most people may have the opposite problem...?
From what we've seen, most people may have the opposite problem...?
Like, here's what we would start off with:
[Here are examples A and B, DETAIL.EXE NOT FOUND.] ---> [This is a topic, and this is a common theme.] --> [We just found examples C and D for later, because they are similar and help elaborate.] ---> [DETAIL.EXE NOT FOUND.]
[Here are examples A and B, DETAIL.EXE NOT FOUND.] ---> [This is a topic, and this is a common theme.] --> [We just found examples C and D for later, because they are similar and help elaborate.] ---> [DETAIL.EXE NOT FOUND.]
It sort of leads us into a "CONCLUSION.EXE COULD NOT RUN" situation, because we know what we want to say, but working out those details for us takes such a long, long time.
Often either with input, or we'll take months and nothing will seem relevant anymore once we say anything.
Often either with input, or we'll take months and nothing will seem relevant anymore once we say anything.
As we said: it seems like most people have it a little bit different?
[Detail one] + [Detail two] + [Detail three] ---> [Conclusion one] --> [Conclusion two also has both detail one and three in it] --> [maybe there is a common theme in it?] ---> [person looks and sees topic]
[Detail one] + [Detail two] + [Detail three] ---> [Conclusion one] --> [Conclusion two also has both detail one and three in it] --> [maybe there is a common theme in it?] ---> [person looks and sees topic]
What we're saying is that our brain seems to look at these things and notice them more sporadically. We aren't sure why that might be.
Like....this is literally why we tell people we NEED to know what we.dhould be looking for, and that if you tell us to read something we are completely new to, we won't understand.
It's because we get [TOPIC] and [DETAIL] but don't see [CONCLUSION]. https://twitter.com/NoPuzzl98/status/1322389704017432576?s=19
It's because we get [TOPIC] and [DETAIL] but don't see [CONCLUSION]. https://twitter.com/NoPuzzl98/status/1322389704017432576?s=19
Or we won't see [DETAIL] at all, we'll see [TOPIC] and then we'll have a giant zip file with no folders and the details just blow up at us.
We can learn very fast otherwise. It's just, if we don't know your baseline assumptions, we WILL crash and burn haha.
We can learn very fast otherwise. It's just, if we don't know your baseline assumptions, we WILL crash and burn haha.
We don't really know how else to explain this.
It's something that's irritating for us too, we promise.
It's something that's irritating for us too, we promise.
