Historically, guidelines use a pairwise comparison 1⃣vs2⃣; maybe others too: 3⃣vs 4⃣, 2⃣vs4⃣. This can leave the user of a guideline confused as to which intervention to actually use at the end of the day.
Network meta-analysis has helped to compare the harms and benefits across multiple interventions; but there are a lot of other important considerations (Evidence-to-Decision framework)
- Values and preferences
- 💰Cost & cost-effectiveness
- ⚖️Equity
- Acceptability
- Feasibility
Now we've proposed a method to consider all these factors across multiple interventions and created a @GRADEproGDT software solution to make it easy for guideline developers. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ @artur_nowak @evidence_prime see: http://gradepro.org 
Finally, we've also validated the approach in multiple guidelines from @EuropeanCommiss and @WHO, including this @WHO guideline on tuberculosis infection prevention and control #EndTB https://www.who.int/tb/features_archive/WHO-issues-updated-recommendations-TB-Infection/en/
You can follow @twpiggott.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: