Incredibly unprofessional statement from an organization no matter what one's position on the underlying question of whether the Biden article should have been published. https://twitter.com/ErikWemple/status/1321896097099489283

I can't evaluate the argument between Glenn Greenwald and the Intercept until the Biden article is actually published and I see what claims he made and what evidence he used. I don't see how anyone else can come to a conclusion yet either.

If it makes unsupported claims that do not meet Intercept's journalistic standards, then they were right to refuse to publish. If it meet standards that the Intercept uses in other cases, but they rejected it because it's about Biden, Glenn is right to claim political censorship.