Read on Twitter
Not voting is an act of barbarism by @johnastoehr https://stoehr.substack.com/p/not-voting-is-an-act-of-barbarism?r=5msd&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=twitter
1. I’m told that, compared to the Detroit Free Press, The Detroit News is second rate. So perhaps it’s not the best example of the point I want to make. Even so, the paper’s editorial in today’s edition provides an occasion for saying the following: *not voting is immoral*.
2. You can choose—or you can have the choice made for you. You are not alone. You are among equals. Others are depending on you to engage the national political community. Not voting may seem principled, but it’s not. It’s an act of barbarism.
3. The News’s editorial, like all editorials, is the voice of the newspaper as a state and local institution and bedrock of Michigan’s civil society. Today’s editorial, overseen by Editorial Page Editor @NolanFinleyDN, refused to endorse Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
4. It refused to make a choice. Worse, it made that refusal appear as if it were noble. The headline: “For president, we can’t lend our name to men whose values we don’t share.”
https://www.detroitnews.com/restricted/?return=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.detroitnews.com%2Fstory%2Fopinion%2Feditorials%2F2020%2F10%2F29%2Fpresidential-endorsement-withheld-detroit-news-fourth-time%2F3745346001%2F
https://www.detroitnews.com/restricted/?return=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.detroitnews.com%2Fstory%2Fopinion%2Feditorials%2F2020%2F10%2F29%2Fpresidential-endorsement-withheld-detroit-news-fourth-time%2F3745346001%2F
5. No doubt there were political calculations. The News is quite conservative. Finley is very conservative. The odds of the incumbent winning, which would be the preferred outcome, appear to be fading. Meanwhile, the future for Michigan Democrats seems downright rosy.
6. The News is a business. It has a reputation to keep. A conservative daily paper deciding against deciding is probably a convenient way of saving face.
7. But you can’t base an editorial on the need for a local institution to avoid humiliation. It has to be positive. It has to be about values—at least the appearance thereof. In this, Finley has a lot going for him.
8. Even if the News’ editorial is really about saving face, it can appear noble. American political culture, which elevates the individual above the community, which honors rights before it honors civic duties, respects the refusal to choose.
9. After all, if you dislike both candidates, how can you vote in good conscience?
10. There’s the problem. Voting isn’t done in isolation. It’s social behavior as much as it is a political behavior. America isn’t an abstraction. It’s a real political community of shared values (equality, for instance).
11. Each and every one of us, citizen as well as non-citizen, is a member of this American community. It is indebted to us. We are indebted to it. The individual and the community are themselves equal. They are one.
12. You recognize that fundamental or you don’t. If you don’t recognize a citizen’s minimal obligation to a free republic, well, I think it’s fair to doubt your commitment to it.
13. You might disagree, but you can’t say not voting is socially or politically responsible. You can’t say voting for third-party or write-in candidates is responsible either.
14. Given the context of an authoritarian president threatening our security and well-being, with 233,000 covid-related deaths and counting, you must concede the danger posed by the 43 percent of “undecided voters,”
15. according to a Morning Consult poll, who might vote for someone other than Trump and Biden. In this context, votes for third parties are votes for the incumbent, but with the benefit of appearing independent and virtuous. https://morningconsult.com/2020/10/27/trump-biden-undecided-voters-polling/
16. That’s worse than not voting. Not voting is refusing to participate. It’s telling the rest of us your dedication to democracy is soft. Voting third party is participation, but it’s participation in the form of political sabotage.
17. Worse, it’s done “nicely.” It’s done “in good conscience.” It’s sabotage with gas-lighting piled on top. It’s destructive behavior that denies being destructive while accusing others of infringing individual liberty.
18. Not voting and voting third-party/write-in reinforce each other to work **against equality**, indeed hold it for random. These are not acts of virtue. These are acts of barbarism.
19. Making all this worse is the attitude we must take to convince benighted citizens not to sabotage their own community. That attitude, infuriatingly, takes a tone of polite persuasion rather than empurpled contempt, which is what they deserve.
20. Amitai Etzioni, the famed communitarian philosopher, took out an half-page ad in Sunday’s Times to plead with “progressive non-voters” to vote for Biden, not Trump or a third-party. “A few thousand votes for Ralph Nader cost Al Gore the 2000 election,” Etzioni wrote.
21. “In 2016, 12 percent of Sanders supporters voted for Trump—enough to ensure his election. Your vote matters more than ever. Thanks for giving me a hearing.”
22. (Full disclosure: I voted for Nader in Ohio! I will never ever ever vote third-party again.) https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-09-29/voting-third-party-is-a-mistake-that-ill-never-make-again
23. Like I said, Etzioni is polite, but politeness can’t stand up to a political culture that gives the appearance of morality to immoral acts. We need a different course.
Full article: https://stoehr.substack.com/p/not-voting-is-an-act-of-barbarism
Full article: https://stoehr.substack.com/p/not-voting-is-an-act-of-barbarism
24. The Editorial Board is what I do for a living. Please show your support by subscribing annually ($60) or monthly ($6 for a total of $72). In any case, thanks for reading. Vote! https://stoehr.substack.com/subscribe?utm_medium=web&utm_source=subscribe-widget&utm_content=15831489
25. An Editorial Board subscriber offers this demurrer.
