Facebook, Google and Twitter are all publicly traded companies.

How are they controlled against their own customers wishes?

This seems absolutely insane in the world of business.

I attempt to take an in depth view of how these companies are controlled.

This led me to think that insanely rich people who go unreported like the leader of communist China (whom I honestly think is a trillionaire, a dictator of the 2nd largest economy)

Vladimir Putin (who has taken over every major industry in his nation IE insanely rich)

By now we should know one thing;

There are a group of elitist globalists hellbent on changing the world and are using the corona virus as an opportunity to accelerate their vision.

But the question that needs to be answered is HOW are they infiltrating these companies and convincing them to act against their own self interests?

Its outright insanity. No business in history goes AGAINST THEIR OWN CUSTOMERS WISHES. It’s a death sentence.

What is institutional ownership of a company’s shares? (Stocks)

Let’s look at some of the biggest investment firms on the planet

imagine investing/monitoring to the tune of 1/3 the USA’s entire GDP. That’s power, that’s influence that’s everything.

If you trade any stocks you’re probably familiar with Blackrock but who TF is Blackrock? Who runs the show?

You probably never heard of Larry Fink and it seems he likes to keep it that way.

He should easily be one of the wealthiest men in the world but his net worth, publicly, is stated at $1 billion as of 2018

As with most of these investment firms when you look closely enough it seems all roads lead to Rothschild. And Larry Fink, who is a kingmaker, seems to also be in business with the Rothschilds.

In my estimation these companies like Facebook, Twitter, CNN etc. are controlled by the super wealthy elite, through their proxy’s (investment firms who controls tens of trillions of dollars) who want to shape the world in their view. Many of you know this as the NWO.

Once @realDonaldTrump became president we seen an unusual amount of CEO’s start stepping down resigning being ousted, fired or retiring, even in a time when it was very lucrative to be a CEO. This trend has continued since 2016 and it doesn’t make any sense.

Imagine looking forward to all those extra millions in bonuses and stock options just to step down. This is again insane. No sane person would step down in such a lucrative time in history These jobs are once in a lifetime opportunities that you went to school most of your life 4

I started this thread solely because of the company AMD and I’ll try to connect the dots for you on how it all ties together.

@realDonaldTrump and our government has staked the future of America on technology. This is apparent by banning Huawei and a massive deal that would move semiconductor foundries to the US

Now funny enough, INTEL at the time was a top 5 company it was Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Berkshire Hathaway and INTEL with over a $500 billion market cap.

Not long after @realDonaldTrump announces this world shifting policy the CEO for Intel gets fired.. by a leftist movement that was sweeping the world at the time.

Let’s delve into the insanity of this for a second. Not many people on this planet can manage a top 5 company let alone lead one into the top 5 and Brian Krzanich was one of them. Intel was an absolute BEAST in the chip sector and held a monopoly for years.

This was mostly thanks to Brian Krzanich and his leadership. So what horrible deed would constitute the firing of this man?

That’s rights a consensual relationship. Not even an accused rape, which is the lefts favorite weapon.

Now I don’t pretend to know what’s going on behind the scenes now but Intel has been weakened considerably since his firing but luckily, instead of a Chinese company rising to take its place it seems AMD is more than up for the challenge.

Since Intel’s fall from grace AMD has been slowly taking market share and ramping up. At the time Intel was trading at $60 a share (with splits) and AMD trading was trading at $3. Now AMD is consistently trading at about $80 and Intel at $45

Now AMD has decided to buy Xilinx one of its biggest rivals for $35 billion. It’s a huge deal but what started this entire thread wasn’t the deal itself but the details. They’re buying the entire company out with solely stocks, not a penny in cash.

What this does is add ADD to AMDs outstanding shares, hence its price drop despite its great quarterly report yesterday and giant news of the acquisition. AMD already has a large amount of shares outstanding at about 1.2 billion shares.

In comparison google and amazon have less. If AMD pays $35 billion with shares worth $80 a piece we get about 500 million shares added to AMDs outstanding share count 35 billion divided by $80 leaves us with about 470 million. Why does this seem important?

For starters it makes controlling an owning stake much harder. AMD is almost adding Amazons entire outstanding shares to its already large number of outstanding shares.

This makes a hostile takeover harder. It makes it harder to fire their CEO over essentially nothing and makes it easier for AMD to invest in America and vice versa. It seems.. calculated.

It’s not uncommon for companies to use shares to buyout other companies but the way things lined up with Intel and @realDonaldTrump investing in semiconductors for future security and banning Huawei..

•The illogical fall of Intel months after @realDonaldTrump announces these plans

•The rise of AMD

•What we learned about investment firms and who controls them.

•AMDs insulating against tactics that gutted Intel.

•Shifting power to China.

All point to one thing.

There is a technological war being waged in front of our eyes and our president is making damned sure we win.

This issue is one of the single most important issues that will shape our future. Let’s bring these companies home and make sure they stay here.