Read on Twitter
not the original anon, but well agreed i had an account awhile back and we were mutuals i guess or so to say?? an… — im gonna tweet the reply under this bc apparently it's too long pls read it thanks https://curiouscat.qa/lomuis/post/1151662648
okay i Hate talking about blouies but for some reason we're talking about them now so you're in for a rant. we live in a heteronormative sexual world where someone is seen as straight and enjoys sex unless and until they come out. the problem with blouies and bharries is that +
they're removing the person's personality and treating them like a sex object. we /don't know/ that louis is sexually active and/or enjoys sex and if you disagree with me on this it is offending and therefore aphobic so don't even try this with me. so this is our number one +
problem: we are reducing someone to their sexual life that might not even be existent. im not going to act like louis is asexual, because for all we know he is straight and he has written about sex before – im just saying that there Are asexual people and what blouies and +
bharries do to fit their own fantasies is not it. the second problem here is that someone is not a ‘bottom’ or a ‘top’ because they're a nice human being or whatever. im the first to admit that louis is one of the softest people on the planet. he is. he is soft and sweet and +
extremely babie half the time. that has Nothing to do with what he enjoys in bed. someone can have a small build and be incredibly shy and be so soft but they can also, frankly, like sticking their dick in someone's ass. because that is a sexual position. believing louis isn't +
fit for everyday things like driving is dehumanising and offensive, because you are taking that sexual position that you decided he loves (and we still don't know if he is sexually active in the first place) and making it his only defining personality trait, when it is not a +
personality trait. ‘oh my god he is so soft he's such a bottom’ is bullshit because, guess what, that is a sexual position. the third problem is that while they're erasing louis' masculine side, they're also pretending harry's feminine side – which we have seen him grow into +
over the years, mind you – doesn't exist. i can say harry likes wearing dresses and nail polish – because he does. because it is something he has done multiple times and said he enjoys. i cannot with the same confidence say that louis enjoys dresses and nail polish – because we +
simply do not know that. i don't care what anyone thinks, because i'm the first to throw both louis and harry into everything ‘feminine’ when i write their characters – but that is exactly what that is: fiction. if louis loves wearing nail polish and dresses, that's amazing and +
i know he looks gorgeous in them and im proud of him. but he's never done that so im not allowed to assume. our last problem is that, if we're seeing this from a larrie narrative, this relationship has been going for ten years. im not going to talk about h&l now because their +
sexual life (or lack thereof) isn't mine to talk about, but in any relationship that lasted ten years and is still going, i would think things get switched around in the bedroom. if things happened in the bedroom in the first place.
all in all, this loulou and haddy thing (and +
all in all, this loulou and haddy thing (and +
whatever equivalent of that bharries have) is a disgusting, dehumanising fictional concept and i truly hope the boys don't know about it. regarding fanfiction, ive not read anything like that so im not going to talk about it.
ive resorted to worrying about blouies (and bharries)+
ive resorted to worrying about blouies (and bharries)+
from a distance – i don't interact with them, have most of them blocked, and whenever i do talk about them it's in a joking manner. they exist and i wish they could change their views but im also not their parent and want nothing to do with them so maybe let's leave them alone. +
and finally i respect your fiction preference as long as you keep it to that, just fiction.
