Read on Twitter
the other TIL is it doesn& #39;t seem the "record" keyword *guarantees* immutability
mutation with reckless abandon
it can be made *easier* but immutability is definitely not guaranteed. no warnings etc with a mutable record
also fun you can put access modifiers on init-only setters tho i& #39;m not sure why you& #39;d want to
access modifiers are enforced at compile time with lambda expression trees, too. but you can still build it manually and it works
the docs were a little confusing as it describes records as "immutable by default" but i dont think the record does not reflect this statement (ha ha) https://github.com/dotnet/docs/issues/21224">https://github.com/dotnet/do...
