A picture is worth a thousand words. (1/11)
But let me explain what that was a picture of. In March, Congress passed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. It included a provision that allowed some workers who were affected by COVID-19 to take two weeks of emergency sick leave with full pay. (2/11)
When I saw this legislation, I hoped that it would reduce the spread of COVID-19. I knew the literature on paid sick days, and how they stopped the spread of illnesses like the flu. (3/11)
But I was also worried. The law didn’t apply to workers at large employers. So millions of food and retail workers were left out. Workers without the resources to stay home without pay, who interact with customers face-to-face if they come in sick. (4/11) https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/14/opinion/sunday/coronavirus-paid-sick-leave.html
Oddly, the law also carved out healthcare providers and emergency responders🤷‍♀️. (5/11)
So @NicolasZiebarth, Wen + @StefanPEcon's study made my jaw drop. Comparing the change in reported COVID cases in states that already had paid sick laws to those who didn't, they find that the new law reduced COVID transmission by 400 cases PER DAY. (7/11)
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00863
400 cases per day. 400 cases per day, despite the large numbers of vulnerable workers who were left out. 400 cases per day, despite the lack of a coordinated public awareness campaign. 400 cases per day, despite the fear of employer retaliation in a slack labor market. (8/11)
So of course that made me wonder: how many cases could be prevented, and how many lives could be saved, with a better paid sick leave guarantee?

A question that is all the more pressing as the number of new COVID cases hits an-all time high. (9/11)

(chart from @nytimes)
You can follow @alixgouldwerth.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: