@ExtaticT thought that they could pretend the UN resolutions concerning the NK conflict don’t say what they actually say, so I am here to show everyone why we can’t dispute very clear documents (using evidence). A thread:
True. It is worth mentioning there are 4 UN Security Council Resolutions + 3 UN General Assembly Resolutions in relation to the NK conflict. Also these are not used to justify violence ofc but rather to affirm that Armenia is a occupational force in Karabakh + the 7 rayons
This is just immediately not true as in the 3rd/4th paragraph of each Sec Council Resolution, the tensions are described as being between the ‘Republic or Armenia and the Azerbaijani Republic’:
Wrong. Demand ‘the immediate, complete and unconditional withdrawal of all ARMENIAN forces from all the occupied territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan.’ Within these documents they refer to NK as ‘the Karabakh Region of the Azerbaijani Republic’. Make your own conclusions.
All were rejected as all were done without the knowledge of Rep of Az and the USSR. Furthermore Azerbaijan succeeded from the USSR with the exact same borders and territory as Azerbaijani SSR, as seen by even Armenia’s own map they provide to the UN

Azerbaijan claims NK as a autonomous region as referred to in the docs. It was decided by Stalin that the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan would remain in Azerbaijan instead of be given to Armenia. However it would be made into a autonomous region which is exactly what happened.
True. As a starting point of action towards peace, they demand ‘the immediate, complete and unconditional withdrawal of all Armenian forces from all the occupied territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan’ which Armenia has not abided by to this day.
In other words just read the actual documentation and please don’t believe everything you see on the internet as for the person who wrote this: Seriously....?
You can follow @aylinzle_.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: