President has 2 choices. Under Art 26 of the Const, he can refer to the Supreme Court to test for constitutionality. Not a real case, no set of actual facts before them. If they say it’s ok & likely would, it’s v hard to challenge after that. Or...1/2 #

Or he can sign it into law & a real case can be taken. There are lawyers & survivors already lined up to take cases. His accompanying note is also highly unusual in that it essentially signals his thoughts on this. A great shame to see others twist this into something it’s not.

This thread from @Tupp_Ed gives an excellent back story to all of this. https://twitter.com/tupp_ed/status/1320645943407116290">https://twitter.com/tupp_ed/s...

Theres some good pod cast suggestions in there too. This is also on my to do list today also from @maeveorourke https://twitter.com/maeveorourke/status/1320674983119626240">https://twitter.com/maeveorou...

This thread is also fantastic. https://twitter.com/maeveorourke/status/1320361948429602816">https://twitter.com/maeveorou...