(1/n)🤦🤦Great this was the only thing left to see.

Mahishasura was the son of Rambha, and the great-grandson of Brahmarshi Kashyapa.
HE WAS BORN IN A BRAHAMAN LINEAGE.
LIBERALS NOW DIGEST THIS PLEASE. https://twitter.com/VikasTribal/status/1320232663723044864
(2/n) He had secured a boon from Lord BRAHMA that he can be vanquished only by a woman, this made him felt invincible.

Mahishasura had established his rule in Amravati ( the kingdom of Indra)
(3/n) This is what Mahishasura had said to Maa Durga👇
The biggest mistake of Mahishasura was that he thought that this is just a mere woman she can't defeat her, so he has all the right to see her as a property.
(4/n) As far as this adivasi thing is concerned here it is all coming from-
There is a tribal community called Asurs who venerate Mahishasur.

That do not make him Tribal🤦

Even today there are many temples dedicated to Demon king Ravana and Duryodhana.
Does that make them
(5/n) belong to the community who worships them?

Ravana was was Kanyakubja Brahmins, a Brahmin sub-sect in Madhya Pradesh, not non-Brahmins, who have been venerating Ravana as their ancestor.

Many people worship him, does that make him belong to that community? What a logic
(6/n) Killing of Mahishasura has only one meaning defeat of Adharma by Dharma.

Around 1686 CE the great Guru composed Var Sri Bhagauti ji ki, popularly known as Chandi Di Var. Surjit Singh Gandhi the Sikh historian explains in detail the Mahishasura Mardhini described in
(7/n) the powerful poetry of Guru:
👇👇
(8/n) continue 👇
(10/n) https://twitter.com/TIinExile/status/1284783246551642114?s=20
You can follow @TejakshMK.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: