While I broadly agree with this piece by @tavleen_singh that fanatics of all religions have to be dealt hard, both ideologically and with rule of law. However, 2 points in this piece drew my attention to the contrary:
1.) The writer argues dat Islamism is more dangerous to ..cont https://twitter.com/IndianExpress/status/1320201650364006403">https://twitter.com/IndianExp...

India than Hindutva, because it is more organized. I disagree because no fanaticism can be more dangerous than a majoritarian one. And though islamic fanaticism is obviously more organized globally than Hindutva, same is not true for intracountry. Helped by ppl in power, ..cont

There& #39;s no force that is more organized, and hence a bigger threat, than Hindutva.
2.) & #39;Humbly& #39; suggesting and & #39;urging& #39; the Muslim community to give up their 2 places of worship to Hindu community is akin to telling them - "Peacefully surrender, or else u have seen Ayodhya".cont

This suggestion is simply outrageous, illegal, based on complete faith on unquestionable superiority of one faith over another.
This suggestion conviniently ignores the existing & #39;Places of Worship Act& #39;.

End of thread.