While I broadly agree with this piece by @tavleen_singh that fanatics of all religions have to be dealt hard, both ideologically and with rule of law. However, 2 points in this piece drew my attention to the contrary:
1.) The writer argues dat Islamism is more dangerous to ..cont https://twitter.com/IndianExpress/status/1320201650364006403

India than Hindutva, because it is more organized. I disagree because no fanaticism can be more dangerous than a majoritarian one. And though islamic fanaticism is obviously more organized globally than Hindutva, same is not true for intracountry. Helped by ppl in power, ..cont

There's no force that is more organized, and hence a bigger threat, than Hindutva.
2.) 'Humbly' suggesting and 'urging' the Muslim community to give up their 2 places of worship to Hindu community is akin to telling them - "Peacefully surrender, or else u have seen Ayodhya".cont

This suggestion is simply outrageous, illegal, based on complete faith on unquestionable superiority of one faith over another.
This suggestion conviniently ignores the existing 'Places of Worship Act'.

End of thread.