I& #39;ve got all these people whining in my mentions about how it& #39;s not a romance if the couple doesn& #39;t end up together (what& #39;s Casablanca, then? or Romeo & Juliet?)
and all I can say is
fuck your boring, traditionalist, slut-shame-y idea of what constitutes a romance. https://twitter.com/TheLadyLudovica/status/1319387864078188551">https://twitter.com/TheLadyLu...
and all I can say is
fuck your boring, traditionalist, slut-shame-y idea of what constitutes a romance. https://twitter.com/TheLadyLudovica/status/1319387864078188551">https://twitter.com/TheLadyLu...
I wasn& #39;t going to say anything after the first indignant Romance Novel Stans got all up in my mentions, but now they& #39;re just annoying
and maybe we could have a good convo about whether rigid genre limits are good but
yo, assholes: the original tweet was about TV & MOVIES
and maybe we could have a good convo about whether rigid genre limits are good but
yo, assholes: the original tweet was about TV & MOVIES
The original tweet (now deleted, probably because y& #39;all Traditional Romance Novels OMGZORZ!!!1!! stans swarmed the poor person) was promoting this article: https://mashable.com/article/romcoms-without-happily-ever-after/">https://mashable.com/article/r...
Gotta say, the entire "genre is sacred writ" attitude about novels is also gross as fuck, though.
A romance without a relationship at the end is like fantasy without magic users--unusual, but hardly so different that it should be a different genre.
A romance without a relationship at the end is like fantasy without magic users--unusual, but hardly so different that it should be a different genre.